SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157325)5/18/2003 2:11:55 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 164684
 
Bug, misrepresenting Bush's plan in order to claim the "other alternative" is the best course is a transparent "straw man" argument. You proclaim the "better" answer to be a short-term broad injection of cash "to folks who would actually spend it" (your solution), rather than some imagined giveaway to the rich that excludes those "folks who would actually spend it." You are misrepresenting the Bush tax cuts by claiming that they are not broad-based, but only "give to the elite wealthy." Doing so does not make the case for an alternative that history shows does not work in stimulating the economy.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157325)5/18/2003 2:13:40 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
hopefully you get out and vote in 2004, although I think you are CA so Bush won't win here anyway.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157325)5/18/2003 10:03:57 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Respond to of 164684
 
You are throwing around old cliches like a carnival barker.

C'mon, knock it off. You sound like Howard Dean, a huge fraud from New York.

You really don't want to sound like that do you?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News