Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BWAC who wrote (172823)	5/19/2003 11:14:33 AM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

<ot> LOL, yes I suppose there is always that chance. Probably if that's the case the material would be subscriber-only to justify the extra laughs. Like some revolting reality show... As a purely hypothetical example of such PPV content: "XXXXXXX's soul exposed - a study in petty greed Last week I told you how I sold my unborn children to Merck for use in their laboratories, in return for pumping their stock. Pretty low, you think? Why, that's nothing! Just to begin with, their flesh was already owned by J&J anyhow. So obviously going short on Merck was a smart move there, and I got some good suckers. Hey, it's tough being a big wheel. When I ran a hedge fund we regularly scammed thousands, and even Jehovah's Witnesses knew better than to stop by after we turned three into soup - disposed of at a profit - and sold another two into slavery in Moroccan brothels. Ah, I pull my beard at you all. Today I'm paid to say how much I like EBay, and why not to worry even though you'll all be dead before seeing any return from it that doesn't require a greater fool to buy you out..." or am I being too fanciful there?