Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (241671)	5/20/2003 1:06:38 PM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

that used to happen on SI.

To: GraceZ who wrote (241671)	5/20/2003 1:10:32 PM
From: Bid Buster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Is that in the perpetual motion machine sector? -g-

To: GraceZ who wrote (241671)	5/20/2003 2:31:12 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

heh heh <g> still pluggin that one, eh??

To: GraceZ who wrote (241671)	5/20/2003 2:38:56 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

I have been warning people about that guy for three years, maybe more. He was once suspended from SI for doing that. He probably does more damage, though, by his glib palaver about stocks and the market. Well, maybe not. If you follow his suggestions you have a 50-50 chance of being right.

To: GraceZ who wrote (241671)	5/20/2003 3:05:00 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 436258

LOL! Nice.................

To: GraceZ who wrote (241671)	5/21/2003 1:26:45 AM
From: _scar_face_	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Everything I know about securities law tells me this is an illegal solicitation. Unless you can site specific law, or case law, making a case for a breach, I'll assume you were just trying to be funny (it worked). Otherwise, I'd like to hear your non-legal opinion to see whether or not your knowledge of SL started and ended with the movie Wall Street that's implied in that statement. It'd take class to PM that to Bob first, or Zeev, since you're not a lawyer, and are uncertain with the legality. This way, you could have saved yourself from further potential embarrassment, and addressed your discomfort with said issue.