Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (407871)	5/20/2003 5:25:10 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The fact that they do not have a mass following is neither here nor there. We all know liberals exist, after all the majority voted for the more liberal candidate in the last election. They are systematicly excluded from media exposure by the owners of the giant conglomerates like ClearChannel, News Corp., and the Unification Church. It is very much here and there when their voices are relegated to page 52 of print media while the right wing view is shouted 24/7 from every publicly granted airwave. TP

To: Neocon who wrote (407871)	5/20/2003 6:24:24 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

In addition to this... Message 18960866 ... I was thinking of how liberal executives at Big Media organizations manipulate opinion by stacking op-ed pages with liberal columnists. The New York Times editorial page has seven regular columnists. Six are avowed liberals and one is a "moderate" republican. The Boston Globe, like their parent, has just one token conservative on the op-ed page to go along with six proud liberals. The LA Times, WP and Tribune are all overweight with liberal columnists as well. Pinch and Howell and crowd need to keep up with their Columbia academic counterparts at the Manhattan Club, you know.