SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17462)5/22/2003 11:35:46 AM
From: bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32883
 
Bingo!

Good post...Could not agree more.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17462)5/22/2003 11:40:14 AM
From: Rick Faurot  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 32883
 
Moderated boards have provided welcome relief from a small fringe of posters who persist in obsessive personal attacks on various individuals. It has been these vicious personal attacks, not moderated boards, that have been a black eye for SI.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17462)5/22/2003 11:41:38 AM
From: Justin C  Respond to of 32883
 
I think that the decision to moderate or not moderate any thread, stock or otherwise, should be at the full discretion of the thread originator, not Bob nor anyone else. This is a must for an acceptable level of civility to prevail .. this can be seen by looking at almost any Yahoo stock message board.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17462)5/22/2003 12:04:45 PM
From: Alan Bell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32883
 
Moderated threads play a critical role. There are times that opposing views simply cannot be discussed civilly on one thread. People who are excluded are always able to create a new thread and sometimes that thread ends up dominating the original.

The one improvement I think would help would be to have full disclosure - i.e. have the ability for the thread participants to see who has been excluded by the moderator. It would allow the active participants to influence the moderator to reconsider his/her decision. It would also allow participants to know who does not have the ability to defend their views on the thread.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17462)9/12/2003 5:19:14 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 32883
 
I do agree with you, Jeff.

There are in the end only two responses to speech that is considered obnoxious.

One is censorship.

Two is countering speech -- answer bad speech with good speech.

Those are really the only two options.

Both IH and SI have chosen the censorship route. That's too bad.