Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (84208)	5/22/2003 6:07:29 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

"I've proven my case and disproven yours repeatedly." Where? You just say "nuh uh." That's no case. I've proven my case and disproven yours repeatedly, and I'm not lying when I say that. I have the documents right here in front of me. I've shared bits and pieces, some posts, public docs. I have PMs, email, biz plans... Heck, I knew ihub was suspect and I'm no message board guru as you claim you are. I wasn't even thinking of working there. I didn't even want to post there until you told me to give it a shot. Even tony told you not to go there but you did. Many people said ihub and matt and company were suspect yet you went. I will paraphrase something you said about yourself once. "Bob is widely recognized as a person of unimpeachable integrity" I don't agree. His ego and pocketbook control his actions. He just "says" he has integrity. I can say I'm a size 2 but anyone can take one look at me and see that I'm a size 6 to 8. You remind me of Michael Jackson when he says he's had no plastic surgery except two nose jobs. Yeah, right. He can say it til he's blue in the face but it won't change the facts.

To: SI Bob who wrote (84208)	5/29/2003 10:56:56 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 122087

Waiting for Matts response about Goelo

To: SI Bob who wrote (84208)	5/29/2003 10:56:56 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 122087

When do we get charged for using the search function on SI?

To: SI Bob who wrote (84208)	5/29/2003 10:56:56 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 122087

Bob, why would you say such a thing and state the oposite to the investment community? Does Matt Brown also agree with this statement? "The site on which we’re based, Investors Hub, has an unsavory reputation, based in part on the conduct of the previous funder, and the ability of “touts” to squelch negative opinions about their stocks because of poor implementation of its “Chariman Of The Board” concept, which gives power to users that is reserved for Administrators at other sites."

To: SI Bob who wrote (84208)	5/30/2003 11:13:36 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 122087

BOB, THIS GUY WANTS TO TAKE A "GUN" TO THE SEC. I CAN SEE WHY YOU STATED WHAT YOU DID ABOUT THE CHAIRMAN CONCEPT SINCE ON THE NEGATIVE POSTS ARE DELETED POSTS LIKE THIS ARE WELCOMED AND NOT DELETED BY THE CHAIRMEN OR HIS HENCHMAN. THE RIGHT THING FOR YOU TO DO IS SUSPEND THE THREAD ADMINISTRATORS BOB. DO THE RIGHT THING. OTC BB \| Miscellaneous \| Hartcourt Companies (HRCT) Public Reply \| Private Reply \| Keep \| Mark Last Read Replies (1) \| Next 10 \| Previous \| Next Posted by: operator In reply to: operator who wrote msg# 27800 Date:5/30/2003 6:45:13 AM Post #of 27838 I learned this from the Marine. Should we take on the SEC? USMC Rules OF Engagement 1. Bring a gun. Preferably, bring at least two guns. Bring all of your friends who have guns. 2. Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Life is expensive. 3. Only hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss. 4. If your shooting stance is good, you're probably not moving fast enough nor using cover correctly. 5. Move away from your attacker. Distance is your friend. (Lateral and diagonal movement are preferred.) 6. If you can choose what to bring to a gunfight, bring a long gun and a friend with a long gun. 7. In ten years nobody will remember the details of caliber, stance, or tactics. They will only remember who lived. 8. If you are not shooting, you should be communicating, reloading, and running. 9. Accuracy is relative: most combat shooting standards will be more dependent on "pucker factor" than the inherent accuracy of the gun. 9.5. Use a gun that works EVERY TIME. "All skill is in vain when an Angel pisses in the flintlock of your musket." 10. Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty. 11. Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose. 12. Have a plan. 13. Have a back-up plan, because the first one won't work. 14. Use cover or concealment as much as possible. The visible target should be in FRONT of your gun. 15. Flank your adversary when possible. Protect yours. 16. Don't drop your guard. 17. Always tactical load and threat scan 360 degrees. 18. Watch their hands. Hands kill. (In God we trust. Everyone else, keep your hands where I can see them). 19. Decide to be aggressive ENOUGH, quickly ENOUGH. 20. The faster you finish the fight, the less shot you will get. 21. Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet. 22. Be courteous to everyone, friendly to no one. 23. Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation. 24. Do not attend a gunfight with a handgun, the caliber of which does not start with a "4." Stay informed about the deals that shape the business world with The Deal!

To: SI Bob who wrote (84208)	6/1/2003 5:13:11 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

ECNC mumblings and thoughts... "The company has a vision, goals, and very dedicated managment..which reminds me. Tom has his whole life invested in this. It's his child, literally. He traded some of his own shares for an acquistion to help the company. When you have managment dedication like that, ther is only one, end result: Success." FM To:Sprintcar who wrote (3544) From: Matt Brown Thursday, Sep 16, 1999 8:46 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5030 ECNC mumblings and thoughts... I would recommend that each and every one of you go to this site and read it..read the QandA and read the Products link e-connect.cc I was reading it and I totally forgot about the eGaming mess and all that junk that people have claimed (and myself at one time) has made eConnect lose their focus. ECNC was never focused on eGaming in the first place. I think this was supposed to have been another testing ground for them..but in light of SNMM getting nearly shut down and raided, it was a wise move to get the heck out of this sportsbooking. People that were 'betting' just on the sports book for ECNC had the wrong view....IMO and didn't know their HW. Probaby the biggest reason for getting in the betting end was cash flow. Read the qanda on it. It siad that it was providing good cash flow from the get go. But now they had to let go...They were trying to stop issuing shares... I was amazed and didn't realize just how many kettles they had in the fire. When whoever said that they were up to their ears in work, I wasn't so sure about it, but now I can understand it. They have so many new technologies and places to implement it, it is amazing. And what is neat is that they have a unique concept of the ATM crards..this has been previously, not available. I think they are targeting the rights areas so far with the market place. I really like the idea of the Internet ATM division. That is really my 'area' that I understand and like. At first, I was not impressed when I found out the idea about the "hardware" you had to have to use the ATM card via the internet ...but then I decided to kick in my logic mojo. My mother HATES with a passion to put in her CC# over the internet, but doesn't blink twice about giving it to a $5/hr clerk or sliding it through the machine at WalMart. I bet this little device that is simple to attach would increase pepole's confidence, very highlly, because it is something they are familiar and comfortable with. I truly didn't catch that until tonight. But now, the more I think about it, this could be something that the big retailers would support BIG TIME. It would increase their margins big time, let people use ATM cards, and increase confidence in their website. Plus, it all goes through this eSecure stuff with security certificats...bascially, I think it's a major psychological thing that people will love. Key is to get this baby rolling, which I think Tom has going..but right now, he is testing it all out... I think after this testing and he has a lot behind him as 'proof' and stats, he could just walk up to Walmart CEO or JcPennys or Gap or whatever, throw a presentation up on his little laptop and BAM! he has a new client. It would be that simple, IMO. After a few do it, they will be calling HIM. It will be like a big snowball effect. People will want it, they'll sign up for a box or it will be distributed through the 'distributor' or retail channel...then you will have customers writing companeis requesting that they support ECNC "perfect" system... Wow...I got into that deep and way way ahead of where we are now....wheww...got carried away! LOL Bottom line is- at .20, from an investors' view, the stock is well worth it. I plan to get my shars as close to .20 as I or cheaper until the dumb money is done dumping.... The company has a vision, goals, and very dedicated managment..which reminds me. Tom has his whole life invested in this. It's his child, literally. He traded some of his own shares for an acquistion to help the company. When you have managment dedication like that, ther is only one, end result: Success. FM