SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Quincy who wrote (129246)5/24/2003 10:19:15 AM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Wireless and Batteries

Has anyone tested or seen any articles on how much quicker a laptop's battery drains with/without WiFi and with/without cdma 1x. For WiFi (or whatever) to challenge cdma it has to be self sustaining anywhere, anytime.

Plugging into the wall doesn't do it for me. Having one wire as opposed to two seems like much ado about partial liberty.

WiFi (like any 'higher' capacity wireless standard) makes lots of sense where there's power. Everywhere else, the power hungry will give way to the most power efficient capable devices. Today, isn't that a PDA based 1x cdma phone?

It is hard to see WiFi, EDGE, UMTS or whatever challenging cdma 1x on the power front. Once networks move out, I'd expect power efficiency to become the driver of market growth.

Dr Jacobs has used a laptop for years. He must know the power/network impacts. Has he been quiet because the determinant is still the "Office"?

Doesn't dual cpu chips highlight the power problem and who's cpu is the most power efficient?

Trevor



To: Quincy who wrote (129246)5/24/2003 12:55:49 PM
From: Dexter Lives On  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
ETRI, WiMAX and <font color=Orange>3GPP</font>.

Uhh, "...thinks they can find a solution."; make that "existing 4G platform technology". Talk to the 4G Koreas Committee.

Can't figure out just what Korea has against the US, errh make that qualcomm, errh scratch that... -VBG

Not to mention <font color=RoyalBlue>Samsung</font>...

<font color=Red>Contributions
</font>
(Before or During Session #25)

C802.16e-03/31
IEEE 802.16e Sleep Mode Enhancement (Changhoi Koo, Sohyun Kim, Yeongmoon Son, and Jungje Son, 03/05/13)
C802.16e-03/30
IEEE 802.16e Reporting of Scanning Result (Sohyun Kim, Changhoi Koo, Yeongmoon Son, and Jungje Son, 03/05/13)
C802.16e-03/29
Inter-BS communication for IEEE 802.16e Handoff (Changhoi Koo, Sohyun Kim, Jungje Son, 03/05/13)
C802.16e-03/28
A method of providing fast Handoff service for IEEE 802.16e (Liao Jingyi, Wang Hai, Dong Seek Park, Itzik Kitroser, 03/05/13)

grouper.ieee.org

Good luck with your 3g kludge...

PS Lest we forget; Intel, Nokia and Fujitsu as well...
wimaxforum.org



To: Quincy who wrote (129246)5/24/2003 9:29:46 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
You still don't have a paging channel implementation that keeps your demodulator DSP engine in a mobile device from sucking down a battery waiting for the ring.

Yeah... I can just see you talking to Henry Ford... "you still don't have something that can swim a stream and climb a hill and go all day on a bag of oats and five gallons of water..."

What is and what will be are two different things. And what is necessary is something else. When you get over that hangup then maybe we can have a rational discussion.

John