SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Noel de Leon who wrote (99050)5/24/2003 8:29:09 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
That may well prove to be chemical company propaganda. There is so much propaganda of all sorts floating about these days.

Including from those who have vested interests in providing competing products or alternative lifestyles...

That information, btw, came from the Environmental Protection Agency... They have a vested interest in promoting their own environmental agenda (and are staffed with plenty of environmentally minded folks).

Hawk



To: Noel de Leon who wrote (99050)5/25/2003 8:37:12 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Even Greenpeace finds little to dislike about glyphosate in ground water. It binds to soil, and what doesn't bind degrades quickly.
archive.greenpeace.org

But I think it's irresponsible to use it on suburban lawns, just to get that weed-free look. In the US there are lots of commercials on TV promoting the use of Roundup on your lawns as something wonderful. All the poisons run off the lawns up the hill and through my back yard on their way to the storm drain and out through the water into the Chesapeake, eventually, killing aquatic plants and frogs as they merrily go on their way.