SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (2669)5/27/2003 7:00:02 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
SEC to require fraud control assurances

boston.com

By Carrie Johnson, Washington Post, 5/27/2003

he Securities and Exchange Commission plans to vote today to require executives of public companies to attest that their firms have controls in place to detect accounting mistakes and fraud.



The rule will require managers to evaluate whether they have adequate rules to prevent employees from committing fraud and to sign off on the rules as part of an annual report filed with the SEC.

Congress, in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act last year, directed the SEC to address the problem of lax financial controls at public companies. SEC officials declined to comment on the rules before they are released.

Faulty internal controls, or the failure of companies to issue and follow clear rules about how financial statements are prepared, were cited by regulators in several major accounting frauds, including those at Rite Aid Corp. and WorldCom Inc.

''Internal controls can be a significant deterrent to management fraud,'' said Douglas R. Carmichael, chief auditor of the new federal accounting oversight board. ''They're not a foolproof solution, but they have a lot of potential for improving the situation.''

Securities lawyers noted, however, that internal controls cannot prevent all frauds.

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, a trade group, praised the planned rule.

This story ran on page C4 of the Boston Globe on 5/27/2003.
© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.

[ Send this story to a friend