SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (1456)5/26/2003 8:26:00 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 793797
 
Geez, if the two best reporters the Times have are sniping at each other, it doesn't bode well at all. The air must be very thick in that newsroom.

I take back what I said about Kurtz. I hadn't seen his CNN show for awhile, but I watched it yesterday. I think he needs to drop it. The first segment was about the "Jayson Blair" scandal. Isn't it time we quit calling it that? No mention at all that the scandal is about a lot more than just one wayward reporter.

Then he talked about the poll taken that said 66% of Democrat voters couldn't identify a single Democrat candidate. The operative question was, "is the media not giving them enough coverage?" Didn't even raise the possibility that nobody cares to hear what they have to say.

Bob Schieffer was the guest for the whole show. Kurtz' fawning over him was unseemly, to say the least.

In the final segment he talked about how Hollywood-made TV shows and movies of a political nature don't reflect reality. (Gee whiz, really?) Then he went on to explain how important these shows are and that they really should do a better job in how they present things.

These shows are important? C'mon Howie, get a grip...



To: LindyBill who wrote (1456)5/26/2003 10:23:10 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793797
 
Intra-Times Battle Over Iraqi Weapons

Fascinating. Thanks for finding it. I've thought the Miller stories were odd for some time. She kept reporting "findings" of wmds which no one else did and then dropped the story to go on to another "finding."

The conflicts between Burns and Miller sound like classic dustups between star reporters; not some new evidence of decay at the Times.