To: LindyBill who wrote (1473 ) 5/26/2003 1:03:46 PM From: epicure Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843 That was your inference. I would be "implying" since I was writing. I was implying I am a bargain, but feeling ripped off would not be anything like what I feel, that was totally your inference (as the reader you infer, as the writer I imply). I feel privileged to work with the young- I wish more people felt that way. But since most people care about money, money will be needed to attract better people. Unless you think those fancy law firms pay big bucks to get mediocre people.... Usually money gets you quality- in food, in clothing, in jewelry, and in employees (and in almost everything else- religion might be an exception- thought to look at Saint Peters you have to wonder.) And btw- I said I was working part time. So if you think a flat out statment of fact is an inference or an implication, you need remediation. "To:JohnM who wrote (1439) From: X the Unknown Monday, May 26, 2003 2:50 AM View Replies (2) | Respond to of 1474 There is no substitute for care and concern. Students who do not get care and concern at home, will look for it from other adults. If the adult who cares about them is a teacher, chances are they will do well at school. If, instead, the local gang leader pays attention to them, they will go that road. It's very simple in theory, but it takes time to manifest care. As a teacher I spend every afternoon emailing or calling parents or guardians of young adults who are having problems at my school. I spend my lunch hours tutoring- and not just my subject, other subjects as well. Because I put so much time in, I find I can only work part time, and I spend a lot of money on my classes. For my BA in Biology (summa cum laude) and my JD in law, I am paid 22k a year (gross). It's a labor of love, and I do love it. But I can't see too many people like me going into the profession in California- since teachers can't buy houses even on the full salary in expensive markets."