Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (99197)	5/26/2003 10:12:21 PM
From: Lou Weed	Respond to of 281500

<<I am just pointing the holes in your argument, which set up a "legitimate" community that "respects international law" against the rogue Uncle Sam.>> Nadine...my argument began by citing the lack of evidence of wmd's, you then countered by saying the wmd argument came front and center because Blair wanted a UN resolution and this was a by-product. I then cited other examples i.e. Al-Qaeda links and international law. You then countered by saying that I accuse "rogue Uncle Sam" of being the only one held accountable to this which if you read back on the posts are your words not mine! <<I would trust the accuracy of a Jpost story over a NYT story any day.>> With what happened recently you would be correct to assume this. However the NYT is still a highly regarded source of information. To cast it aside completely because of the actions of one rogue reporter would be a mistake in my opinion. I'll be eagerly awaiting the Post articles you refer to and I'm being honest here, I hope we can uncover hard links to AQ for the sake of our credibility in international circles. MON