Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (17699)	5/27/2003 11:25:14 AM
From: Rick Faurot	Respond to of 32883

Another view, from someone who actually uses IHUB: Posted by: excel In reply to: IH Admin [Matt] who wrote msg# 24940 Date:5/27/2003 10:02:41 AM Post #of 24942 Matt. Does anybody still think boards about specific stocks are still "dominated" or "controlled" by whoever starts them? I'd like to see an example of that. Kind of like paid bashers. Show us the proof. The way the boards are set up if someone is controling negative posts than the ones who are participating on the board aren't doing their part. What I mean by that is you have your board monitor. Than you have your board assistent. Under each post is the available option for ALL board participants to be a board monitor/assistent. It's called tos. It amazes me when people make those accuzations yet they don't read the rules they have the right to tos posts they believe the board monitor missed. Or if they feel the board monitor screwed up they can go to tools and contact you and protest to you if their own post gets deleted. No system is perfect. But this current system works quite well.