SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: qveauriche who wrote (129328)5/27/2003 11:16:50 AM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Qveau: you're the lawyer.

"As part of the agreement, Nokia will continue to pay royalties to Qualcomm for subscriber equipment at the same rates established by the terms of the original cross-license agreement in 1992, irrespective of the CDMA standard implemented. "

Is everybody on the board absolutely sure they understand all of the other parts of the deal?



To: qveauriche who wrote (129328)5/27/2003 11:16:58 AM
From: Dexter Lives On  Respond to of 152472
 
Cross-licenses can be very, very tricky. Unfortunately, only a select few have access to the fine print. As always, the <font color=Red>devil<font color=Black> is in the <font color=RoyalBlue>detail<font color=Black>...

google.com



To: qveauriche who wrote (129328)5/27/2003 11:18:56 AM
From: surfbaron  Respond to of 152472
 
Qveau: you're asking for facts is too much for a HOBO.



To: qveauriche who wrote (129328)5/27/2003 11:52:50 AM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
>>>> Moritz experts

I bet if someone pushed Mr. Moritz to better explain his words, one would get a spin about not paying royalties on chipsets sales.

Very much like Eric, what Crammer et al spin is nothing but confusing noise. Although, they would have you believe that it is an offering of clear consise good judgement based on ethical truth and sound investment knowledge.

Given that they are like the energizer bunny, they must serve a component of the investment industry and profit from their efforts. It is only a pity that those links are most likely very soft and they are able to operate without clarity of disclosure on such matters.

You never know though. There have been investment media types who have been called to account for their words.

Best to call 'em how you see 'em and move on.

Trevor



To: qveauriche who wrote (129328)5/27/2003 12:48:48 PM
From: verdad  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
"Wall Street will continue the age-old debate over Qualcomm's impressive strengths and alarming weaknesses."

And the stock will remain about where it stands today.