Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Faurot who wrote (17719)	5/27/2003 1:32:13 PM
From: greg s	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 32871

Bob has the patience of Job. If he (rightfully) was to enforce the clear and unrelenting TOS violations against the Magpie, she would go screeching over to RB or elsewhere where she is still allowed to post claiming that her accusations were true, holding out her suspension/termination as proof. It is best to just let her stew in her own bile while we watch her slowly screw herself into the ground. Actually, it is quite entertaining. I, for one, am not worried about newcomers to SI getting the wrong impression. mmmmary is far too transparent for that to happen.

To: Rick Faurot who wrote (17719)	5/27/2003 1:38:11 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32871

I am posting the truth If someone posts that they're in biz with someone, then later say they're not, posting their original post is not harassment. It's the truth. Just like defamation. If it's the truth, it's not defamation. Only if it were a lie would it be wrong or illegal. Same with libel and slander. The truth is the truth. Matt himself stated ihub was owned by MF and that he was in biz with MF. He should have told his new biz parnters that he already sold ihub to someone else and didn't have the legal rights to it when he sold it to the new people. If you really want the subject to die, you'd quit replying and fanning the flames.