Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (1658)	5/28/2003 1:55:09 PM
From: tsigprofit	Respond to of 20773

Believe as you wish. As a non-American, it doesn't really matter to me, since you don't vote here... I believe Clinton was one of the top four Presidents in the 20th Century. I'm sorry your moral code prevents you from acknowledging that. From your other Christin postings, let me ask you, which would you consider more in the Christian tradition: (1) A man that is flawed, but brilliant. He makes it his mission to try to pass as many bills as possible that aid mainly the poor and middle-class while in office, even while being vilified by his enemies. As a direct result of his actions, many people buy their first homes, see lower interest rates, receive help for education, and have a better life. (2) A man that is flawed, and not that bright. He spends most of his time trying to enrich his wealthy friends, and trying to reduce spending that would benefit most people. His major economic contribution is to cut taxes on the wealthy multiple times, which leads to the greatest transfer of wealth from the middle-class and poor to the rich in our nation's history. Trillions of dollars of future debt will be the result of his programs. This will make it very hard to spend money on the average worker, and the poor in the future. From all accounts of the Christian religion, I think there is no argument that Man # 1 - Clinton - would be preferred as a model versus Man # 2 - W Bush. All IMHO.