Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Neocon's Seminar Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (766)	5/28/2003 7:43:18 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1112

Sorrow isn't as much an entity as it is a quality or an aspect of other entities. Since the possibility of energy being an entity of its own has not been explored, why not give it a go? Energy as separate then its forms... It strikes me as a rather odd idea. It seems to be adding an extra layer of complexity to the system for no scientific or even logical reason. If it was separate it might also have other forms that are as different from one another as infra red radiation is from sound, or it could be one unified thing. Could what we be considered energy be separated from the "true energy". If so would the true energy have any effect on a system without the sound, heat, light, ect? If it is totally undetectable, even by its indirect effects, and if it will never actually be detected by any means then it can be reasonably argued that it should be ignored. The only way it would become an important consideration is if it could act independently of its expressions (heat, light sound ect.) or if a change in the "true energy" could change the effect of the expression, that was not explainable without the assumption of some unseen "true energy". Tim