Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Chesapeake Gold (CKG.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Matz who wrote (643)	5/28/2003 9:57:21 PM
From: Frank Pembleton	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7835

Jon...speaking as a subscriber-- I was warned to reduced my position the gold sector, as-a-matter-of-fact I was warned more than once-- I was possibly warned a half a dozen times by this gentleman...What more could a person ask for??? Fwiw, reducing ones position to a specific sector would mean selling down all stocks you hold (to a comfortable level) in regards to that group. Personally, I don't care how great CKG is-- it'll get killed along with the rest of'em when the bear decides to display some of that alcohol fueled brutality. Regards, Frank P.

To: Jon Matz who wrote (643)	5/29/2003 12:07:07 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7835

Jon, I will never give a specific sell signal on a stock unless the stock no longer fits in my list of favorites even if they may be overbought on the short or intermediate term. For example, I gave sell signals on SWG at $17 and WTC above $4 in January. But never gave one on CKG. I still own it long so it would make no sense for me to suggest selling. However, when I suggest that the metals are peaking and that it would make sense to take partial profits, it is up to the investor to decide what make sense for him. I am sure some have sold part of their CKG holdings in January and are probably buying back now.