SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)5/29/2003 7:02:59 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Milberg Weiss Files Class Action Suit Against eUniverse Inc.

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 29, 2003--Milberg Weiss (http://www.milberg.com/cases/euniverse/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of purchasers of eUniverse Inc. ("eUniverse") (NASDAQ:EUNI) publicly traded securities during the period between July 30, 2002 and May 5, 2003 (the "Class Period").

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from May 12, 2003. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, contact plaintiff's counsel, William Lerach or Darren Robbins of Milberg Weiss at 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at wsl@milberg.com. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at milberg.com. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

The complaint charges eUniverse and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. eUniverse operates a network of Web sites and e-mail newsletters that provide millions of users with entertainment content, as well as products and services.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants caused eUniverse's shares to trade at artificially inflated levels through the issuance of false and misleading financial statements. As a result of this inflation, certain eUniverse officers were able to sell their own shares at artificially inflated prices.

On May 6, 2003, before the market opened, eUniverse revealed that its results for Q2-Q3 fiscal 2003, and possibly other quarters, were false when issued. Trading in the stock was halted by the SEC on this news.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of eUniverse publicly traded securities during the Class Period (the "Class"). The plaintiff is represented by Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes

Lerach LLP, who has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, a 190-lawyer firm with offices in New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boca Raton, Fla., Seattle and Philadelphia, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States. Milberg Weiss has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers and companies, as well as victims of World War II and other human rights violations, and has been responsible for more than $30 billion in aggregate recoveries. The Milberg Weiss Web site (http://www.milberg.com) has more information about the firm.

CONTACT:

Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP

William Lerach, 800/449-4900

wsl@milberg.com

TICKERS: NASDAQ:EUNI

SOURCE: Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page. URL: businesswire.com

05/29/2003 14:03 EASTERN



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)5/30/2003 9:29:49 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
SEC seeks ban on Ernst & Young

David Teather in New York
Saturday May 31, 2003
The Guardian

The securities and exchange commission is seeking to ban accounting firm Ernst & Young from taking any new clients for six months in what is seen as further evidence of US officials cracking down on corporate wrongdoing.
At the same time Schering-Plough, the pharmaceuticals firm, said it is under criminal investigation for allegedly selling unapproved drugs, submitting false pricing information to the government and obstructing justice.

The SEC, the US financial regulator, is seeking the injunction on Ernst & Young for allegedly failing to maintain independence from the clients it audits. Accounting firms have been under the spotlight since the collapse of the energy firm Enron called into question the relationship between the company and its auditor Arthur Andersen.

Enron went bankrupt after it emerged that it had created a series of off-balance sheet entities to hide its debts and inflate profits. The discovery led to Andersen going out of business.

The SEC claims Ernst & Young had violated auditor independence rules by working too closely on a computer software project with the company PeopleSoft, a client whose books it had audited.

It alleges Ernst & Young entered a marketing agreement with the company to sell its software.

"In this case, the evidence shows that in its relentless pursuit of profits deriving from relationships with its audit client, PeopleSoft, Ernst & Young lost sight of, and failed to meet, the high standards for the public perception of independence," the SEC said in a court filing.

Ernst & Young said it "strongly disagrees" with the SEC and said it had "no reason" to pursue sanctions. The case is pending before a Washington judge.

Schering-Plough said it had received a letter from the Massachusetts US attorney's office notifying it of the investigation. The letter warned that the government believes it has substantial evidence to support an indictment.

The company has previously said that its sales, marketing and clinical trials process was under investigation but the latest letter details a wider and apparently more serious criminal inquiry.

Schering said the investigation is focusing on four areas including the offering of incentives to doctors and managed care organisations to buy drugs from the company under federal funded programmes, including free samples and clinical trial grants.

Prosecutors are also examining the sale of misbranded or unapproved drugs and submitting false pricing information to the government which is used for the calculation of rebates under the federal Medicaid programme. The obstruction of justice investigation is trying to establish whether the company destroyed documents to keep information from the inquiry.

Schering said it would continue to cooperate with the investigation.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)5/31/2003 2:03:44 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
"According to the indictment, of each $10,000 investment, $4,500 went to telemarketing, $3,500 to PowerSource and $1,600 to associated companies, leaving $400 in working capital."

Seven Charged in Calif. Energy Scam

By CATHERINE WILSON
.c The Associated Press

MIAMI (AP) - Seven people were charged Friday in an investment scam that prosecutors said capitalized on the California energy crisis by offering wildly exagerated returns in exchange for investing in an electricity wholesaler.

Prosecutors called PowerSource a ``worthless business'' supported by telemarketers, millions of spam e-mail messages a week and a Web site telling potential investors they would reap up to 100 percent returns on a $10,000 investment.

Three California men pleaded guilty to fraud conspiracy charges after surrendering in court, and four other people tied to a group of interconnected companies were arrested in Florida and California, including a man barred nearly a decade ago from the telemarketing business.

Thomas Norton, who was charged with fraudulent telemarketing in a separate case 10 years ago and served eight months in prison for contempt in that case, is again charged with criminal contempt for allegedly going back into business despite a court prohibition.

Barbara Wells, the prosecutor, said Norton collected up to $1.2 million while some people lost their life savings to his pitch.

His attorney, William Norris, said the accusations are exaggerated, saying a significant part of the indictment indicates ``Mr. Norton is somehow responsible for the energy crisis that overtook California in 1997 and 1998.''

According to prosecutors, the promoters offered annual returns of 40 percent to 100 percent for a $10,000 share in partnerships involving PowerSource from late 1998 to early 2001.

According to the indictment, of each $10,000 investment, $4,500 went to telemarketing, $3,500 to PowerSource and $1,600 to associated companies, leaving $400 in working capital.

In late 1998, PowerSource had $600 in the bank, the indictment said. A year later, it was in default on a $210,000 loan.

Norton and his wife, Patricia Riley, are charged with running the telemarketing operation. Also charged was David Freeman, one of the salesman.

E. Douglas Mitchell, PowerSource's president, was arrested in California on a conspiracy charge. Ronald Johnson, James Miles, and Gary Spink, all of California, pleaded guilty to the conspiracy charge and posted bail.


05/31/03 00:11 EDT



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)6/2/2003 10:28:52 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
OUR HERO'S BIG SCORE By CHRISTOPHER BYRON

June 2, 2003 -- I blush to confess it, but here at Cranky Acres, where nothing brings more joy than feeding captured Democrats to our feral Rotweilers, we have a new hero. Most embarrassing of all, he might actually be French. Le Hero? Mon dieu!
For now, Monsieur's true identity remains le grande mysteré. Quel dommage! But his triumph is there for all to see, immortalized in some recent Securities and Exchange Commission filings by a French company bearing the name Biocoral, Inc.

Whoever he is (and there may be more than one), our new Hero - described in SEC documents as simply being among a group of "Accredited Investors" - has almost overnight turned $450,000 into $1 billion by investing it in 10 million pieces of basically worthless paper, then somehow convincing the world (or, at least, let us say, the gendarmes of Wall Street) that this worthless paper should be valued at something approachingthe Gross National Product of Haiti.

In the process, Biocoral's stock, traded on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board, has soared from $5 at the end of February to a closing price last week of $155 - the sort of run-up not seen on Wall Street even at the zenith of the dot-com frenzy.

So how did Monsieur do that? Entre nous, I'll explain. It's all because money on Wall Street is once again flowing from the slow-witted and naive to the clever and the quick, as the current rally brings speculators streaming back into the market. So beware; for as night follows day in these things, après les dummies will again come le deluge.

Since March, stocks have been soaring, lifted by investor hopes that the Bush tax cut plan and the strong housing market will keep the economy expanding. From a closing low of 7,524 on March 11, the Dow Industrials have climbed more than 1,320 points, to a closing price last Friday of 8,850 - a rise of 17 percent in barely 21/2 months.

No one ever knows when something like this will end. It can continue for a very long time, or it can end tomorrow, though recent history doesn't give a lot of comfort to the bulls in that regard. Since January of 2000, when the Dow Industrials topped out at 11,511, the average has undergone four major rallies that have been equal to or greater than the one now underway.

The most recent of these occurred just last autumn, when the Dow surged 21 percent - once again in barely 21/2 months' time.

YET at the end of these four rallies, and several smaller ones, the Dow is still down 23 percent from its January 2000 high.

Meantime, a smart fellow can make plenty of money by cashing in on the naiveté of others - though it is rare to encounter a cleverer scheme for doing so than the one concocted by our mystery hero who has literally turned dross into gold.

Biocoral Inc. itself looks to me to be little more than road-kill in the making. The company, which is located somewhere outside Paris, began life at the start of the 1990s as a so-called "blind pool." In these deals, you buy stock in a company that has no business at all. It uses your money to go out and buy some business that already exists.

The first business the blind pool bought was an industrial warehouse outside Chicago. A year or two later it decided to get out of the warehouse game and, in 1995, it moved into what it calls the "biomaterials" business in the "health care area." As practiced by Biocoral, Inc., this amounts to the business of gluing broken bones back together using some kind of glop made out of ground up coral reefs.

The company got into the bone-gluing business by acquiring the stock of an Irish company that had a patent on the glue glop. The company purchased the stock from two British Virgin Islands companies tied to an outfit named le Societe Financiere du Seujet.

The head of le Societe was an Italian fellow named Riccardo Mortara, who thereupon became chairman and CEO of the blind pool, which changed its name to Biocoral, moved to France, and began promoting its bone gluing activities.

A search of SEC records turns up Mortara and le Societe Financiere in all sorts of curious businesses. They range from "animal cloning" to "cigarette testing" to the financing of rocket launches into outer space. None of them seem to amount to much of anything.

In any case, toward the end of 1997 Mortara passed the bone gluing baton to a fellow named Nasser Nassiri, whose credentials for leading the Biocoral parade included a background in Canadian gold-mining penny stocks.

In the half decade since then, Nassiri has built Biocoral into a biotech powerhouse with 10 employees, 11 delinquent financial filings, $34,537 in balance sheet cash, $350,300 in annual revenues, $1.13 million in losses, a negative current account balance, and an insolvent balance sheet.

BUT genius comes in many forms, and here is how it found expression for Biocoral. Three years earlier, as the stock market began its collapse, Biocoral began issuing 6 percent promissory notes, convertible into common stock, to raise cash.

Some $450,000 worth of those notes, convertible into 10 million shares of Biocoral common stock - which is to say, convertible at 4.5 cents per share - had been biding their time in the hands of our mystery hero Monsieur Accredited Investeur, waiting for exactly the right moment to convert them into stock.

The moment came last December, when the company announced, two days before Christmas, that it was executing, as of that date, a 15-for-one reverse stock split, reducing the total shares outstanding by more than 93 percent, from 19.4 million to a mere 1.3 million.

The reverse split did not, of course, include Monsieur's 10 million shares, since he had not yet converted his promissory notes, and thus received the shares.

So, when Monsieur showed up three days later, on Dec. 26, with his $450,000 of notes and cashed them in, he received back his full 10 million shares of stock, making him the instant owner of nearly 90 percent of the company.

MOREOVER, the stock was in the form of unregistered "Reg. D." shares that could not be sold without first being registered. According to the company, Monsieur had promised not to sell them, so the company did not register them.

This meant that when the company issued a press release in early March saying it had obtained a patent in the U.S. for a process that "induces osteoblast differentiation of human extramedullary adipose tissue cells," and bull market investors began placing orders for the stock in the belief that Biocoral had cornered the osteoblast market in the bone-gluing game, the stock really took off because 90 percent of it wasn't even available for sale. It took just one more press release, issued at the end of April, and by last week this $5 stock was selling for $155, sending this Wall Street bucket of bone glue from $6.5 million in at the start of April, to $1.75 billion by the end of May.

What would you do now if you were Monsieur? Would you try to sell your stock and almost certainly crush the Biocoral market and maybe even precipitate an SEC probe?

Not me. I'd find a stupid loan officer at some bank and say, "Hey, I've got a billion dollars worth of stock here. Would you take it as collateral for a $50 million loan?" Then I'd wire the loot to my account in Mauritius and hop the next flight to Tortola, and never work another day in my life - laughing myself to sleep at night as that $1 billion of worthless collateral, pledged at $155 per share against a $50 million loan, eventually sank back to $450,000, or 4.5 cents. Vive le France!



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)6/4/2003 12:24:09 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
China tycoon under house arrest, shares halted

SHANGHAI, June 4 (Reuters) - Chinese property tycoon Zhou Zhengyi is under house arrest in Shanghai over suspected irregular dealings at his holding company, the China Securities Journal newspaper reported on Wednesday.

State auditors raided Zhou's trade and real estate conglomerate, Nongkai Development (Group) Co, on Tuesday, and seized financial data in a probe into dealings ranging from suspected questionable loans to fraud, the official paper quoted sources familiar with the case as saying.

The reports of a widening investigation triggered a halt in trade of shares in listed companies controlled by Zhou, such as stationery maker Daying Modern Agricultural. Its biggest shareholders are Nongkai subsidiaries.

"The Shanghai authorities have placed Zhou Zhengyi under house arrest since May 26," the Securities Journal said.

"Nongkai and its subsidiaries are being investigated for irregularities in their business dealings."

Zhou, who rose from noodle-shop owner to head of a business empire spanning real estate to finance, is the latest in a string of Chinese corporate moguls to come under official scrutiny.

A flamboyant businessman ranked China's 11th-richest person by Forbes magazine, Zhou was suspected of obtaining loans via shell companies set up by relatives and using those loans to speculate in stock or in improper ways, the paper said.

Nongkai's subsidiaries were also suspected of falsifying receipts, it added.

Chinese state newspapers reported at the weekend that a probe had been launched into two billion yuan ($240 million) in loans Zhou had obtained from the Bank of China, one of the country's four largest.

Police and Nongkai officials declined to comment.

Hong Kong's anti-graft agency arrested Zhou's wife, Mao Yuping, over the weekend, although Hong Kong media reports said she had since been released on bail.

Zhou is also chairman of Shanghai Land Holdings Ltd , while his wife is chairwoman of Shanghai Merchants Holdings Ltd.

Both stocks, listed in Hong Kong, have been suspended from trade pending clarification of the reported allegations.

In China, Daying's hard currency B shares closed at $0.507 on Tuesday, while its yuan-denominated A shares ended at 9.71 yuan. Both had dropped sharply on Monday and Tuesday on domestic media reports of a widening probe.

"Our exchange suspended Daying's trade in line with rules which require companies to clarify such media reports," the exchange official told Reuters.


06/03/03 23:35 ET



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)6/4/2003 12:28:13 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
'Urgent assistance needed...'
E-mail scams flourish; so do victims

By Chuck Jaffe, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:01 AM ET May 30, 2003

BOSTON (CBS.MW) -- Zimbabwean farmer Dominic Dukas wrote me last week, looking for a business partner. Seems he packed $18.5 million dollars from the sales of his farm -- sales he says were forced by political instability in his country -- into two metal boxes that he shipped to Amsterdam.
Now Dukas, who says he is white and has no traceable relatives, wants my help in reclaiming his money and setting up a business venture somewhere near where I live.

Oh, and he'll give me 30 percent for providing assistance.

On the same day, Gokwe Gonye, son of "one of the few rich, black Zimbabwean farmers" dropped me a line. Before his father was murdered -- also due to the political instability in the country -- he moved $12 million to a security firm in Johannesburg and is offering me 15 percent if I help him transfer the money and then invest it in commercial properties while he moves to the Amsterdam area.

There's a Nigerian doctor -- currently operating out of the Netherlands, presumably near Amsterdam -- who wants me to help him transfer $41.5 million into a foreign account, and a low-ranking former Iraqi cabinet member who swears he's got a handle on $24.5 million of Saddam Hussein's stash of greenbacks just waiting to be moved to an account that I could share in if only I'll help. He's even sorry that it's not more of Saddam's money.

There are a few other similar pleas in my inbox, and then there's the one from Bruce K. of suburban St. Louis, who knows that "there are probably a lot of scams out there like this, but some of these claims just have to be real ... and is there any way to see if this one is."

While you may not consider helping an implausible stranger secure a fortune to be an investment, it certainly becomes one if you fall into the typical trap of "advance-fee fraud," this week's Stupid Investment of the Week.

The Secret Service, which tracks all sorts of currency frauds, received 33,000 e-mails during fiscal 2001 related to this type of scam, ranging from "Is this legit?" letters like Bruce K.'s to complaints from victims.

In fiscal 2002, the agency received more than 10 times that many complaints. It identified 250 cases -- some involving many victims -- that ripped off their targets for $24 million. Over the past 12 years, the Secret Service believes U.S. consumers have lost $2 billion to this kind of fraud.

"And this is one of the most under-reported crimes out there," says Secret Service Special Agent Brian Marr, "because the victims don't want anyone to know they have been taken. The activity we're seeing is a minor, minor fraction of what's happening on these things."

Advance-fee frauds have been around since at least the mid 1980s, when they involved letters instead of e-mails. The development of the Internet has simply made them more prevalent, and easier for the criminals to pull off.

"And this is one of the most under-reported crimes out there because the victims don't want anyone to know they have been taken."

Secret Service Special AgentBrian Marr


Stupid Investment of the Week is designed to help investors spot trouble -- the places where they can get into trouble or wind up with investments that are far from ideal. While advance-fee frauds are not the typical SIOTW, they do point out one of the key dangers in being naive and greedy while pursuing something positioned as a money-making opportunity.

In any advance-fee fraud, the letter is the set-up. Typically, the contact starts with someone claiming to be from Nigeria or one of its neighbors (many investigators call this a 4-1-9 fraud, after the section of the Nigerian penal code that covers fraud schemes), claiming that there is great wealth to be had by allowing the letter writer to use a bank account to move funds.

Those funds could be reported to be sitting in anything from a dormant government account to Dukas' steel boxes.

The victim is skeptical about giving out their own bank account number, fearing a fraud where the victim somehow reaches into their existing account.

Seeing an "opportunity" to cash in by being helpful, they may open a new account and think they are protecting themselves when they give that number -- to an account with virtually no money in it -- to start the process.

But giving the bank account number merely signals the scammers that there's a bite on the line. They're not, generally speaking, after the money in that account.

"You give them the account number and they tell you the money is ready, but that they need to bribe an official first and they want you to wire them $500," says agent Marr. "You think 'What's $500 of the millions I'm getting?' and send it."

"The scam continues that way, one problem or snag to the next, until you stop paying," Marr said.

Marr noted that the fraud can get worse if the scammers convince you to visit their country, carrying thousands of dollars in bribe money.

"By the time they've set you up over there, you'll be so anxious to come home that you'll give them the money just to turn around," he says. "And because most of these crimes take place overseas, they are very tough to prosecute."

Advance-fee frauds have a number of new variations that authorities are seeing. Iraqi money is the current hot button, but there are also letters from supposed lottery winners who will share their jackpot if you help pay the taxes needed to pick up the cash, as well as from foreign headhunters who promise an overseas job in exchange for a headhunters' fee.

They all sound implausible when listed in a column like this one, but they sound just real enough that unsuspecting people looking for some financial miracle respond and get suckered.

"They're all fake, there's not one that anyone at the Secret Service is aware of that has ever been real and made the people rich," says Marr. "Don't set up the bank account, don't contact these people, don't think that you're going to be the exception, because you're not."

If you fear that you've been the victim of an advance fee scam and want to pursue a case or if you want to report offers you have received, go to the Secret Service Web site for more information.

Do you have a suggestion for the Stupid Investment of the Week column? Send me an e-mail about it.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)6/4/2003 11:46:24 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Transsexual City trader evades jail in fraud trial
Wed Jun 4, 2:32 PM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - A transsexual City of London trader fraudulently manipulated share transactions worth one billion pounds, the Old Bailey has heard.



But Peter Young, 45, will never face jail after an earlier court ruling found that his schizophrenia made him incapable of standing trial for his alleged crime.

Stephen Climie, prosecuting, said the 300,000 pound a year trust fund manager suffered from "hallucinations and delusions," had a "longstanding gender problem" and was prone to "self harm and bodily mutilation".

In earlier court hearings, Young dressed as a woman and the court heard how he had tried to castrate himself in an attempt to become a woman.

Young, now in a mental hospital, worked for fund managers Morgan Grenfell in London between 1994 and 1996.

Without the knowledge of his employers, he created two companies in Luxembourg, used a share system in Sweden and opened a bank account in Jersey to net nearly 2.5 million pounds through a "golden bond", the jury heard.

His employers became suspicious shortly after he bought a 450,000 pound home for himself and his family. The trial continues.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11693)6/4/2003 11:49:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Ex-Morgan Grenfell man 'made £2m for himself'
By Nikki Tait, Law Courts Correspondent
Published: June 5 2003 5:00 | Last Updated: June 5 2003 5:00

Peter Young, the former Morgan Grenfell Asset Management fund manager, made a personal profit of more than £2m by devising and then implementing a complex warrant-based transaction built around the bonds of a Scandinavian company called Sensonor, a jury at the Old Bailey was told yesterday.


The former fund manager has been charged with concealing material facts about the deal, which took place between 1994 and 1996, from trustees of the large European Growth unit trust which he was running, and whose money was also invested in the warrants.

"Peter Young undoubtably gave himself the opportunity to manipulate the bond structure to his advantage," said Stephen Climie, representing the Serious Fraud Office. "At no stage did the fund's trustees realise that Mr Young had control over the transaction." He told the jury: "Even if you conclude that the trustees were negligent. . . the fact, we say, is that Peter Young concealed material facts."

The case is unusual because Mr Young has been found unfit to stand trial. Accordingly, the proceedings which opened at the Central Criminal Court yesterday cannot lead to a conviction - and the jury is being asked to decide only whether he carried out the acts alleged.

If the prosecution fails to establish this, Mr Young could still be acquitted.

The jury was told that, while Mr Young had been an intelligent, well-remunerated fund manager in the mid-1990s, he had since been diagnosed with schizophrenia, and suffered from a gender identity problem as well as hallucinations. There was a "real risk" that the stress of a trial could lead to suicide, said Mr Climie.

Outlining the alleged scam, Mr Climie said this had involved a Swedish financial services firm issuing warrants convertible into the Sensonor bonds. Those warrants held to maturity would share in extra "bonus" bonds on conversion.

The unit trust, under Mr Young's management, bought all but one of the warrants, he claimed. The remaining warrant was purchased by P. Van Doren - supposedly Mr Young's brother-in-law - but actually held under the control of Mr Young's Jersey account.

In due course, it is claimed, the unit trust's warrants were sold on to two Luxembourg companies that Mr Young had created, and then converted in the bonds about a month before maturity. This meant that all the bonus bonds accrued to Mr Young's remaining warrant - turning an £8,000 investment into more than £2m.

The prosecution alleges that some of these proceeds were then used to buy a house in the UK.

The case continues.