SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 9:19:45 AM
From: ItsAllCyclical  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206085
 
Edge Petroleum to Buy Miller Exploration in Stock Swap
Thursday May 29, 9:07 am ET

HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--Edge Petroleum Corp. agreed to acquire Miller Exploration Co. (NasdaqSC:MEXP - News) in a stock swap valued at $12.7 million.
ADVERTISEMENT


Edge said in a press release Thursday that the proposed deal would boost its proved reserves and production by about 10% and allow the companies to capitalize on complementary producing assets in the Gulf Coast region and complementary undeveloped assets in the Northern Rocky Mountains area.

Miller's exploration efforts are centered mainly in the Mississippi Salt Basin of central Mississippi. At the end of 2002, the Traverse City, Mich., company had net proved reserves of 6.8 billion cubic feet and produced about 6.7 million cubic feet a day. Edge said Miller had about 103,000 undeveloped acres at the end of 2002, including a large undeveloped tract in northern Montana.

Assuming the deal is completed Aug. 1 as planned, Edge's estimated production will increase to between 8.8 billion cubic feet and 9 billion cubic feet for the year.

Based on Edge's closing price Tuesday, Miller shareholders would get about 2.54 million Edge shares. Edge expects that it will have about 12.04 million shares outstanding once the deal closes.

Edge said the acquisition, which must win shareholder approval and meet other customary closing conditions, won't likely add to its work force or affect the composition of its board. The company expects the deal will be nontaxable to both sides.

Edge expects the deal to increase earnings, cash flow, borrowing capacity and its financial flexibility. The company said the improvement will allow it to accelerate its planned 2003 capital program.

The number of Edge shares to be issued to Miller shareholders will be based on the average closing price of Edge's stock for the 20 trading days ending five days before the Miller shareholder vote. The proposed deal stipulates a maximum value of $5 an Edge share and a minimum of $4.70 per Edge share.

Miller directors and key shareholders, who together control 50.6% of the company's outstanding shares, agreed to vote for the deal. If Miller's board were to withdraw its support of the deal, Edge would need to win approval from only 32.7% of Miller's outstanding shares.

Miller has also agreed to sell its Alabama properties to an unrelated private party. At the end of 2002, the land had proved reserves of 700 million cubic feet. Edge said the sale will leave Miller with proved reserves of about 4.6 billion cubic feet, no debt and working capital of more than $3 million.

In the Edge press release, Miller confirmed a Wednesday statement from Calgary-based K2 Energy Corp. announcing an agreement to drop litigation against each other regarding the Blackfeet Indian Reservation in Glacier County, Mont.

Miller shares ended Wednesday at $4.30, off 10 cents, or 2.3%, in Nasdaq trading. Shares of Edge Petroleum closed Wednesday at $5.63, down 15 cents, or 2.6%.



To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 9:25:45 AM
From: GREENLAW4-7  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206085
 
Jim nice to get the BOSS's confirm on what I am also seeing.

I would be very careful long some of thses IPP's if NG starts to bleed it could crush the sectors.



To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 9:29:01 AM
From: onginvester  Respond to of 206085
 
jim p, at first glance one would think that you are correct but the factors involved in this cycle differ greatly. More rigs were running in 96 and 01, GOM shallow shelf gas played a big part in correcting the deficit which won't be a big factor this time as the prospects in numbers are'nt their as they were in 01 and 96. No Ladyfern field found in Canada which peaked in late 01 at 750mmcfe a day which now is down to 150mmcfe and falling. Demand is certainly higher due to more gas fired plants, I would say we are somewhere in the 4th inning with the idea that we are heading for the exits during the 7th inning stretch.



To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 9:29:56 AM
From: aerosappy  Respond to of 206085
 
Natural Gas Fundamentals Point to Sustainable Upturn

URL: rigzone.com

Abstract: The word at this year's IADC Land Contractors Day Conference is that things are looking up for land drilling contractors. Way up.

Analysis: Eleven and counting.

That's the number of times land contractors and colleagues have convened for the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) annual land drillers conference in Houston.

This year's edition featured a virulent outbreak of cautious optimism mixed with the usual review of the industry's current status. That status is good (U.S. land rig counts are up more than 250 units since the first of the year), and getting better.

Conference panel discussions ranged from the technical, including an overview of AC technologies in rig construction, to the theoretical, which provided a depiction of where the land drilling market is headed.

The conference consensus indicated the drilling market was headed higher because of underlying fundamentals in the natural gas industry.

It was pleasant news for land contractors. After all, at events like this conference, there is always enough gray hair that sprouted in response to numerous false starts in the past, including one this same time last year when land rig counts made a quick jump in the second quarter only to deflate for the remainder of 2002.

While contractors have yet to see any meaningful change in day rates, there are indications that the balance of pricing power is shifting toward the field service industry, if for no other reason than demand for rigs will likely be colliding with constraints on rig supply later this year.

Dennis Smith, Corporate Business Development manager for Nabors Industries, Ltd., told conferees that expanding demand for 1,500 to 2,000 horsepower land drilling units is now global. The industry is headed towards deeper targets, not just in the United States but elsewhere. Mr. Smith outlined growing interest in deeper horizons in Canada and Saudi Arabia as well as other international venues. Those projects will draw capacity from the U.S. land market.

Mr. Smith sees a sustained upturn, and he outlined a scenario where the cycle begins with an emphasis on low cost/low risk prospects, then shifts to higher risk/reward targets as customers recognize that an increasing rate of cash flow is real. The current cycle will be more orderly and sustainable than the boom/bust patterns that have characterized the last two events, Mr. Smith said, primarily because of operator spending discipline.

Similarly, Marshall Adkins, the managing director for the energy equity group at Raymond James and Associates, saw a secular change underway as a result of a dynamic natural gas market. This marked the beginning of a multi-year improvement in field activity, Mr. Adkins told attendees. He argued that the present situation is similar to the early 1970s, only this time the commodity is natural gas instead of oil.

Short term, Mr. Adkins envisions a potential train wreck in the natural gas market as production falls, drilling is unable to stem the decline, and the resulting shortfall in supplies can only be offset this summer through driving 700 bcf of demand out of the market via price rationalization.

That destruction must come from the industrial sector, he opined, which has already cut natural gas demand by 10 bcf/d since January 2000. He predicted natural gas prices could exceed $6 per mmcf this summer and that June would provide the first signals of where the market was headed.

Mr. Adkins characterized present trends as part of a long-term move, buoyed by a step-level change in natural gas prices. Fundamentals look good for oil, too, though there are wild cards in oil that make it difficult to project. These include the level of potential fuel switching as natural gas prices stay strong. The result is the same, however. The next four years will be good years for energy and for energy stocks, Mr. Adkins told the audience.

Those words were sweet music to the ears of land drilling contractors.

To understand why, it helps to review the history of the Houston conference. This year's seminar had a new name, Drilling Onshore America, though everyone still refers to it--somewhat affectionately--as Land Contractors Day. The event dates back to the early 1990s. At the time there was grumbling among land contractors that the IADC was focused on the interests of larger contractors in the offshore and international arenas. The IADC initiated the conference as a way to demonstrate to its members that land contractors still occupied a crucial role in the organization.

Of course for most of the 1990s the news was pretty much the same during Land Contractors Day. The rig fleet was declining, day rates were headed lower, and operators were moving offshore or overseas.

But a funny thing happened in 1997. As the gas play in the Gulf of Mexico tightened, operators suddenly began looking toward the U.S. land sector for incremental supplies of natural gas. Telephones started ringing for the land drilling contractor as the nation struggled to meet a shortfall in natural gas. At the same time, the land drilling industry was undergoing a roll up of smaller, privately held drilling fleets into larger publicly held companies, which introduced the sector to Wall Street. The once-forgotten land contractor suddenly discovered that the spotlight was shining on his niche.

Indeed, the 2000-01 cycle started in the land sector first as operators began to harvest existing reserves. While the U.S. land sector offered smaller targets and lower reserves than those offshore, land targets were readily accessible and operators could get natural gas into the pipeline system quickly. The reality today is that more than 60 percent of U.S. gas production originates onshore. That won't change soon. If the U.S. is going to drill its way out of a tightening natural gas situation in the coming months, it will need the land contractor to do so.

While many industry conferences have an early bloom, then fade in a few years' time, Land Contractors Day continues to improve in the quality of its presentations and attendance. The audience topped 270 contractors, vendors, and operators for the one-day event.

The level of sophistication may surprise some observers who view land drilling as a nuts-and-bolts endeavor while assuming all the high-tech developments are for offshore drilling. Stephen Bosworth, manager for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation's onshore drilling division, noted drilling performance on land, as measured by time spent on well, had improved 20 percent within just a year for his company's land drilling program, thanks to PDC bits. He identified this efficiency growth as one of the industry's most significant technological improvements in the last 20 years.

Meanwhile, Steve Johnston, president of CDX-Dart Drilling & Technology, outlined how his company uses proprietary techniques to drill multiple horizontal multilaterals through coalbed methane deposits, essentially mining natural gas in a pattern that resembles the veins in a leaf.

Drilling Onshore America packs a lot of information into a single-day seminar. This year's conference confirms impressions that the oil and gas industry has embarked on one of its periodic episodes of rebirth.

And that's good news for the land drilling contractor.



To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 12:26:13 PM
From: energyplay  Respond to of 206085
 
Hi Jim - I think the weather has been very mild so far, so we are getting big builds - but we should be getting 110 Bcf not 95. In about 2-3 weeks the weather in the East will get hot enough, and the slope of the builds will change sharply to much flatter.

Also onginvestor's point - not as much GOM this time, and those wells procude more tahn average land wells.

Throw in the nuke issue, and more NG used in the base load, and I think we are headed for a big crunch.

If the slope of builds contines up strongly, I will be cutting back my positions a lot. But I think the chances ae < 5 % of that happening...



To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 5:17:01 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Respond to of 206085
 
Hi jim,

Interestingly that's exactly the thinking (on the flipside) that got me rotating most of the yellow stuff last January into overweight NG positions. Argument con was storage was high but on the pro side the depletion rate was steep.

But yep sure bears watching.

regards
Kastel

Edit as I recall russwinter was watching that too but then most of you guys were eh! :o)



To: jim_p who wrote (23126)5/29/2003 5:50:10 PM
From: quehubo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206085
 
Jim, perhaps with $10 NG we could increase the slope in such a manner that the cycle would be over by November 1?

You are looking at a slope being changed by demand destruction, no one is even expecting NG production to stay flat this year. As supply increases and prices drop there will be plenty of demand coming back in play to check prices.