Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (99446)	5/29/2003 9:19:26 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

It is a measure of the weakness of your case, that 2 burned-out trailers is all the evidence. 300,000 U.S. soldiers, to eliminate that threat. 20,000 dead Iraqis. Seems a bit of a disproportionate response. The way it was decided those trailers were for biological weapons, is by eliminating all other possibilities. That's the weakest method for proving anything. If they were used, ever, for producing bio-weapons, there should be traces of it left. There should be positive evidence. Before I believe anything, I need independant confirmation. From a trustworthy source. Not from the US or UK governments. These were the guys who believed those "crudely forged" documents about the hundreds of tons of uranium ore Iraq (didn't really) buy from Chad. Bush2, and anyone who answers to him, has about as much credibility as Nixon and Clinton. Get used to that, because that's going to be the attitude, from everyone except NeoCon Team Players, from here on out.