Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (99453)	5/29/2003 9:37:26 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<<With our new Control Freak Preventive War Doctrine, which can justify doing anything to anyone. We have a whole lot more WMD and delivery vehicles than Saddam ever dreamed of. And we're developing new nukes, small precise nukes, more usable nukes, now that we're way beyond MAD. It's not Saddam who threatens the world. It's us.>>> Am glad you are convinced.and thanks to Allah the message is beginning to sink in, slowly but surely, like a pig in a tank of molasses, that if anyone tries to take out Chicago , poison the New York subway or is training people to do those things we will have their A$$'s, and we have the equipment to do it with. In regard to who has nukes it is the US, Britain, Russia, France, China, Pakistan, India, Chili, and Brazil and coming up is N Korea and Iran. Are you saying we should abandon nukes when these other , more trusted (?), countries keep theirs? Here is some of the earlier UN thinking on that subject fas.org Do you think the US will use WMD's (bio/chems)? Dont worry, the US has fought two wars with less than 300 casulties total, and would have had far more if we had used WMD's. But it is a fearsome threat and we want the Terrorists to be afraid, so dont tell them we wont use them . Its a really stupid weapon anyway- very hazardous to the user -unless one is out to destroy everyone with a plague. And it would cost us a fortune since we provide Medical support to so many Nations If you have a solution, or things to consider in regard to the nuke proliferation problem, the UN would appreciate your input. Sig