Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Chesapeake Gold (CKG.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (688)	5/30/2003 3:48:33 AM
From: stonecrop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7835

<Chingolo could be the big surprised. > I'm sure nothing sneaks by you Claude.What are your thoughts on this post over at the stockhouse cdu board(dated May23).......Elizabeth your thoughts?.... stockhouse.ca. anyone talk to Henk lately? ==================================================================================================== Any idea when results might be released? anyone ever phone the company? I like regular updates but they don't release anything. The information that I got today speaking with Mr. Henk Van Alphen, was that two drill holes got completed at the Chingolo property. The core looked very good but the speed of drilling was very slow, due to the truck breaking down, drill mechanical problems, drill rod breaking 690 feet down. Because of the above reasons and the fact that two drill holes were enough (the orginal plan was to drill five holes) to get an idea on what lay beneath the Chingolo property, a decision was made by Alphen to move the drill rig to the Providencia property. In about two weeks we should have some drill results on both the Chingolo and the Providencia property. It is expected that the Providencia property drill holes may only need to go 35 to 50 metres in depth. The plan also is to go from Diamond drilling to RC drilling when they get a handle on some drill core results on both properties if/when necessary. I trust the above info is of some help regarding developments and timelines. ========================================================================================================== I'm not sure what to make of......."that two drill holes were enough" (??)..... Sounds kinda shallow to me....BWDIK Why would it be in a reversed order going from diamond to RC?? I thought it was always the other way around(rc,cheaper drilling first, to narrow down the anomaly).Is this normal for drilling silver deposits?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (688)	5/30/2003 4:14:58 AM
From: stonecrop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7835

<BTW, you do not buy into the high grade and large findings of IMA exploration. This appears to have even more potential than CDU. > Whats your take on this recent soil sampling news at Navidad? Market seemed to like them, with a good run on decent volume yesterday. Ya know, I can't find a board for IMA as well at SI......Claude by all means. Don't mind me here,us surveyors crunch a lot of numbers at this time of day.....LOL!...zzzzzzzzzzz

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (688)	5/30/2003 7:30:13 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7835

I think IMA is also a buy. I can't see how you can claim large yet but I'll grant high-grade, widespread and interesting and important points in its favor. There's no mention of the alteration, its size and nature. I wonder why? Recent appointments to the board, however, tell me that there's a game afoot and positioning is underway. These are all good people who know what it takes to make the transition from exploration and create value. But the showing still has to survive the drill!