SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justin C who wrote (17986)5/30/2003 10:33:04 AM
From: Matt Brown  Respond to of 32871
 
>>In SI's heyday of the late '90s, the things that seemed to make SI rock were the relative newness of message boards,

A tiny, tiny percentage of people that trade stocks/invest are even aware of message boards. There is a massive market out there of potential new participants in these forums. And certainly plenty of financial geniuses, like SI had in droves at one time. We'll need to pursue them, instead of relying solely on word of mouth.

>>a booming market,

I trade the market pretty regularly. I've commented a few times that it has shown signs of the 1999-type days. Nothing sustained, but the market appears to be trying to get some mojo flowing.

>>and an abundance of message-posters who were interesting, humorous, and civil writers.

I think the SI popluation can grow many times over. We've only seen round one of this community.

>>Is it realistic to expect that these things will return?

Bob and I are certainly betting they will.

>>The newness aspect can't be resurrected, a booming market isn't likely, and the return of the quality writers who've left SI or significantly reduced their postings is doubtful.

I think round two of a market boom and SI, will have plenty of fresh faces and a more sophisticated/intelligent "current" population.



To: Justin C who wrote (17986)5/30/2003 12:44:28 PM
From: Jon Tara  Respond to of 32871
 
I agree, Justin. There's nothing wrong with SI's bells and whistles. It's one of the less annoying stock discussion sites.

Lack of bells and whistles isn't what's keeping people away from SI. It's the fact that the public is a lot less interested in the stock market than it once was.

That said, they ought to fix the bells and whistles that are broken, and not let the speed deteriorate further.