SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (99546)5/30/2003 1:20:02 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
What they say now:

In an interview in the next issue of Vanity Fair magazine, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz cited ``bureaucratic reasons'' for focusing on Saddam Hussein's alleged arsenal and said a ``huge'' reason for the war was to enable Washington to withdraw its troops from Saudi Arabia.
``For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on,'' Wolfowitz was quoted as saying.
He said one reason for going to war against Iraq that was ``almost unnoticed but huge'' was the need to maintain American forces in Saudi Arabia as long as Saddam was in power.

____________________

If what Wolfowitz says now is the truth, then the real reasons for going to war were never said by the Administration. They were totally silent on the real reasons. Instead, they figured out what would scare the American people the most, and endlessly repeated those non-factual "reasons". Clearly, they don't trust Americans to come to the "right" conclusion, if they are given the facts. It makes a mockery of "consent of the governed". 100+ Americans, and about 20,000 Iraqis, died.

Our Presidents will keep lying to us, if we keep letting them get away with it. Reagan got away with Iran-Contra. Clinton got away with lying to a Grand Jury. Now, it looks like GW Bush may get away with his bogus WMD claims.



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (99546)5/30/2003 4:05:19 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
All perfectly compatible with my characterizations.....