Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (99551)	5/30/2003 2:00:19 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No, Win. You sneered at the coalition efforts to make the Iraqi units surrender; I answered that getting them to desert en masse was just as good from the coalition's point of view. That was a straight answer, not a sneer. But apparently, just as you cannot write without a sneer, you cannot read without a sneer either. Hey, how about Arik and the "occupation" thing? The AIPAC language police must be spinning furiously on that one. Hey, yourself. A week ago you were claiming, on the basis of zero evidence, that "transfer" was in the air, implying that the evil Arik Sharon was about to implement it, mocking my claims that Sharon was ruling from the Israeli center. Now that Sharon's remarks prove me right and you wrong, all you can do is sneer at AIPAC (& you're right on one score, the lawyers are spitting blood over the use of the word). And you probably wonder why nobody has civil discussions with you. You don't let them.