Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (99557)	5/30/2003 2:54:18 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

"Would 105 years be a long enough time, for you? What we are doing in Afghanistan and Iraq, isn't much different from what we did in Cuba and the Phillipines after 1898. " Here we go with the Spanish American War diatribe again.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (99557)	5/30/2003 4:12:10 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 281500

20,000 is your body count. I've seen no credible evidence to that. However, we are starting to see quite credible and visual mass graves in Iraq. And re: WMD....If there is nothing there...then the UN was wrong for years as well.... Message 18768434 Comments from Dr Germ, before she was taken in custody by the US forces... 888888888 Message 18690605 The banned missiles being destroyed by the UN arms folks before the war 8888888888888888 Message 18679815 Warheads The suspected plot by Saddam to drop chemical weapons on attacking troops emerged following chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix's 173-page report to the UN Security Council. report listed details of missing weapons which Iraq had not accounted for. They include 50 Scud B warheads and 6,500 bombs laced with chemical weapons, VX nerve agents and anthrax.