SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Those Damned Democrat's -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (1156)5/30/2003 4:56:27 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1604
 
The New Neoconservative Political Agenda







Thursday, May 08, 2003

This is a partial transcript of The Big Story With John Gibson, May 7, 2003, that has been edited for clarity. Click here to order the complete transcript.





Watch The Big Story with John Gibson weeknights at 5 p.m. ET

DAVID ASMAN, HOST: The neoconservative thinkers advising President Bush to go into Iraq are enjoying their day in the sun. So what's next in the neocon agenda, both internationally and in terms of domestic policy?

Michael Joyce is president of Americans for Community and Faith-Centered Enterprise, and he joins me now from Phoenix. Mike, good to see you. Thanks for coming in.

MICHAEL JOYCE, NEOCONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST: Good to see you, David. Thank you.

ASMAN: Paul Wolfowitz, William Kristol, all the others who essentially got what they wanted — or the president did what they had been advising him to do — what's their agenda now internationally, now that Saddam Hussein is gone?

JOYCE: Well, I think to establish democratization in the Middle East is of huge importance strategically, not only for the United States, but for our allies as well. And it is a formidable challenge, which will require lots of effort and time and resources and a military presence.

ASMAN: And it starts in Iraq. If Iraq does not succeed, does the political capital that these guys — Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld — have accumulated, does that wither away if Iraq turns into a bigger mess than it is?

JOYCE: I think, obviously, the stakes are large. But it is an effort that's absolutely necessary and has to be taken with the greatest seriousness and willingness to commit to a long-term project, which I think will be required.

ASMAN: But, specifically, Mike, the bottom line is that there are a lot of elements that might not all come together neatly in Iraq, and it might become a bigger mess than what it is now portrayed as being. Of course, the media focuses on the bad stuff a lot. But if that happens and if Wolfowitz and Kristol and the others say, “Gee, we thought it was going to work out. It didn't,” then what happens to President Bush? Does he start taking advice from his other ear?

JOYCE: Well, the big mess that you described would most certainly occur if we were to have an exit strategy. This has been the sad history of Iraq ever since the breakup of the Ottoman Empire after the First World War. The British got out on the cheap… and set a standard for tyranny, which has lasted right up to the end of Saddam Hussein. So, a recipe for real disaster would be to leave. The challenge of democratizing the region, of holding up the standard for the Iraqi people — which would permit rule of law and representative self-government — is one that we're not going to turn away from…

The president himself at West Point, don't forget, said that we have no empire to export. We have no utopia to establish. So, I think he does not have a utopian idea that this is going to be swift or easy. But I think we're in for the long haul.

ASMAN: Well, no matter who he takes advice from, the one thing that he wants to have the world know about him and believe is that when he says he is going to do something, he does it, whether it is to get the Taliban out of Afghanistan or Saddam out of Iraq. Do you think that word that is important enough for him to believe so he will stick it through, no matter who's right and who's wrong?

JOYCE: I think so. I think he's made a pledge to the Iraqi people. He does not intend to abandon them, but rather to expand their opportunities.

ASMAN: We have got to leave it at that, Mike. I wanted to talk about domestic agenda, but we've run out of time. Michael Joyce, great to see you. Thanks very much. Thanks for coming in.

JOYCE: Great to see you, David. Thank you.

ASMAN: Appreciate it.

Copy: Content and Programming Copyright 2003 Fox News Network, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Transcription Copyright 2003 eMediaMillWorks, Inc. (f/k/a Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.), which takes sole responsibility for the accuracy of the transcription. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No license is granted to the user of this material except for the user's personal or internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may infringe upon Fox News Network, Inc.'s and eMediaMillWorks, Inc.'s copyrights or other proprietary rights or interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of litigation.


URL:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,86404,00.html



To: calgal who wrote (1156)6/9/2003 10:52:10 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 1604
 
Details Sought on Bush Role in Texas Dispute

URL:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29211-2003Jun7.html








By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 8, 2003; Page A07

A Democratic leader asked yesterday for details of communication by President Bush and his senior adviser, Karl Rove, with House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) about a partisan Texas dispute that absorbed federal resources.

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), ranking Democrat on the Governmental Affairs Committee and a presidential candidate, said White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. told him by telephone Tuesday that DeLay spoke with Bush and Rove about the matter.

The issue is politically sensitive because the Department of Homeland Security has acknowledged assisting law enforcement officers who were asked by Republicans to round up Democrats who had fled the state to avoid voting on a redistricting plan championed by DeLay. The plan died when a deadline passed without a quorum.

An FBI agent also helped in the search, but the bureau said it did not act at the behest of politicians. The Federal Aviation Administration gave aircraft-tracking information to DeLay's staff, and his staff sought advice from the Justice Department.

A White House official said Bush and Rove spoke to DeLay before the departure of the Democratic legislators. The official said Bush spoke to DeLay "briefly and in passing" and that Rove and DeLay discussed "redistricting in Texas generally."

Another White House official confirmed Lieberman's conversation with Card. "The summary speaks for itself," spokeswoman Jeanie Mamo said. "The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Transportation are looking into this matter."

A Lieberman source said Card was "vague" in his description.

A senior administration official said DeLay's conversation with Bush "likely" occurred in conjunction with a 45-minute meeting he held April 30 with Republican leaders of the House and the Senate to discuss the tax cut and other legislation. The exodus by Democrats began on May 12.

DeLay told reporters at a briefing on May 13 that, as he walked out of a Republican leadership meeting with Bush the previous week, he had told the president he thought the Texas redistricting plan would pass. The administration official did not know when the conversation with Rove occurred.

DeLay has said he and his staff made no overture to the Department of Homeland Security, and noted that the FAA information was publicly available.

A Lieberman aide said the senator sent a letter to Card yesterday asking for more details. Lieberman said in his letter that Card told him that neither Bush nor Rove "contacted any federal agencies about the missing legislators" as a result of a conversation with DeLay. Lieberman said he was told that Card "had asked others at the White House about this matter and found no inappropriate action had been taken."

The letter quoted Card as saying that he did not intend to respond in writing to a request Lieberman made on May 27 for information about White House involvement.

"In a matter of this significance, where questions have been raised about whether scarce homeland security resources were misused for political purposes, the public should not be forced to rely on private reassurances," Lieberman said.

Lieberman's letter asked for a written description of White House involvement, including "any contacts and actions, even those you do not believe to be inappropriate."

© 2003 The Washington Post Company