SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (410498)5/30/2003 5:27:15 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Without witnesses, the scientists were in danger of being misquoted with ramifications both political and for their scientific careers.
khilafah.com

This was but one of many red herrings. Rumsfeld kept changing the rules trying to find something, anything which would make the Iraqis look bad to help justify the oil grab. There were U2 flights, demands for documents known to be destroyed, and the destruction of missles which were borderline specs at best. There was never a chance that Iraq could have avoided the invasion, this was a war of naked agression, not of some intransegence by Saddam.

TP
Edit- remember how Junior or Rumsfeld wouldn't ever say what Iraq had to do, they just used the vague word "Disarm" so there was never the chance that the Iraqi's would ever comply.



To: Neocon who wrote (410498)5/30/2003 6:18:13 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
What is the weapon of mass destruction that can make it's warhead on the way to a it's target.

What is the weapon that can be programmed to independently target and release multiple sub munitions of mass destruction on a trip to some destination and when it gets there look like thousands of just like it that are so common they are as noticed as a wheelbarrow at a construction site or a wheelbarrow factory.



To: Neocon who wrote (410498)5/30/2003 7:47:14 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
One has to wonder.......if there are/were no WMD then why have scientists, who could not speak candidly, at all?

M