Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (170217)	5/30/2003 7:56:12 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583391

Conservatives do recognize that different crimes can be more or less severe. They also recognize that perjury is a relatively severe crime. Your two statements above confirm what I said earlier.....conservatives do not distinguish crimes based on their severity. Perjuring yourself by denying that you had sex when, in reality, you had would not receive nearly the same punishment that someone else would receive had he perjured himself by denying he had killed someone when, in fact, he had. Assuming that no WMD are found, what should be Bush's punishment? The political hit he will take. Lying should properly cause such a hit, but it isn't a crime unless its under oath. If the hit is enough for him to lose his reelection bid then that will be a more severe punishment then most politicians get for lying. I agree. I don't disagree but before the war started, this was not the reason the war was deemed necessary. Therefore, I find its sudden surfacing as the reason to topple Saddam somewhat suspect. Suspect of what? The reason was mentioned, even if it was not given as much weight as WMD. I think its brought up a lot now because the WMD have not been found. That's what makes its authenticity suspect. ted