SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (735)5/31/2003 9:25:22 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
STANLEY HILTON INTERVIEW: 9/11 in the service of radical Neo-con goals? Part 1

prisonplanet.com

Interview date 3/11/03

AJ: He has a busy schedule. He’s been in court, all last week and all this week. We had him on about a year ago. He’s Stanley Hilton. He was brutally attacked by the big government pimps Hannity and Colmes. He was a senior advisor for Bob Dole, counsel for Bob Dole and others in the Republican Party. He’s an expert on government-sponsored terrorism and has written a book about it, throughout history. And he now has new revelations never before revealed from his depositions of witnesses involved in and around 9/11. He represents over 400 of the victims of 9/11’s families and he has been given almost no attention. While some of the other groups headed by well-known PR bureaucrats, we’ve had them on the show, as well, are trying to suppress this information. Joining us is Stanley Hilton. We are honored to have you on the show Stanley.

SH: Glad to be here.

AJ: Tell us just a little bit about yourself, your lawsuit, recap what we covered last year and in the last year. Tell us what’s developed with the lawsuit and the new revelations that you told me about on the phone.

SH: Well, we filed the lawsuit last May against Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and several other of the rest of the terrorists that run the U.S. government for complicity in causing and also in aiding and abetting the 9/11 attacks, in order to promote their political agenda. And, we are in the process, you know these lawsuits, they come and they go in terms of level of activity. And most of it is done, you know, in confidential, called discovery, litigation that is depositions under oath, battles in court to get documents. We are facing very strong resistance from the government. They are claiming national security over everything. They claim they don’t want to release documents, etc. But I represent the people who were victimized by what the government did. I’m also challenging the constitutionality of the so-called USA PATRIOT Act, they call it; the anti-patriot act is what I call it. And Patriot Act I and II, with II in the wings, which the government plans to introduce this year, which will be even more severe than Patriot Act I. And this new one, Patriot Act II, they are going to give Bush the right to declare any American citizen a “enemy combatant” arbitrarily. And then take away your citizenship. This will give the government the power to literally strip any American of citizenship if Bush says you’re an enemy combatant, ie: political opponent of the government. So anyway , we saw some very interesting documents and memoranda, including several of those advisors around Bush, namely Wolfowitz, Wormser, Feith, Perle, the rest of them. And they actually wrote these memos several months before 9/11, in which they fervently wished for a “Pearl Harbor type incident” to give them the shock value that would enable them to ramp through their agenda.

AJ: And this you told me last week before this was on ABC News that you have gotten some of this information through depositions and some other little tidbits that haven’t been disclosed. But also, you talked about how you deposed, you got the marriage certificates, the evidence, the photographs – a woman who was married to one of the hijackers. You talked to what you said were six or eight people who were connected to them. And then we have the news articles where the FBI gave them homes, paid their rent, followed them around. We know Israel was involved in similar things. Can you speak to that please?

SH: Yes, I do have a witness who was married, she’s an American woman, but she was married to one of the hijackers and she knew about seven of them. She met seven of them. Essentially these Arab hijackers were double agents. That is, they were operating inside the U.S. for ten to fifteen years in “cells”. Some of them used the term al Qaeda, they’ve used other terms. Al Qaeda is just a word. That means nothing. You could call them the Muslim Brotherhood, the Army of God, they go by all sorts of names. But what they are is a series of cells that have been aided and abetted by the U.S. Government. This woman was involved also, married to him at the time of the 1993 World Trade Center first bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing when her “ex-husband” actually traveled to Oklahoma City several weeks before the bombings. And they were involved, apparently, in that.

But what we have here is double agents. In that they nominally appear to be Arab fanatics. But one of the points that she stressed is they are really not Muslims. They are more interested in Playboy than in the Koran. I mean these people drink. They are very secular. They are not the fanatical Muslim zealots that the Bush criminals would lead us to believe is what’s operating here. What they are is they receive regular payments from the U.S. Government. They have been recruited by the CIA, FBI, counter-intelligence, and so-forth and paid money and allowed to exchange information with U.S. government agents about various activities going on and....

AJ: Let me stop you right there Mr. Hilton. Everything you said was already backed up by mainstream reports. You’ve gotten it now, in sworn testimony in depositions under oath. But something that everybody wants to ignore is that three of the hijackers, at least, were trained at Pensacola Naval Air Station not at a local airfield – on the base, by the government, at least. Now we find out that eight of the hijackers under names we heard are still alive in the Middle East, on television doing interviews. You know, their faces, their names, same people. We have then Mohamed Atta being sent over to the Defense Language School at Monterrey. You talked to Steven Butler.

SH: Yeah.

AJ: The Colonel there, the Dean of the school. So, we know this. And then I have the stories on infowars.com, in prisonplanet.com in the 9/11 archives, which is a great research tool for anybody, where they admit – FBI paid for their houses, FBI lived with them, Mossad lived with them. Now, you’re saying double agents. And you’re saying what we already had the pieces of here without your depositions, but it’s a great confirmation, that they’re involved in World Trade Center I in ’93 and Oklahoma City. But here’s the deal, the FBI cooked the bomb, trained the driver, gave the guys the detonators in the first World Trade Center. We know that. That’s in the New York Times. We know that the feds were inside planting the bombs at Oklahoma City and had these Iraqis outside with McVeigh. I’ve talked to police, the FBI. So when you say double agent, I would venture to say that these are double agents who were still alive who were just seen at the scene of the crime while the globalists militarily carry out the attacks themselves. That’s where the evidence points. But what you’ve proven and what the news has proven is they at least received payments and training and protection and the FBI has been told not to stop these al Qaeda groups. Go ahead.

SH: Yeah, the witness I was talking about, personally met Atta – two Attas – Mohamed and the younger brother. And they are alleged to be two of the ones on the airliners. You know, the thing is, these individuals are, in my view, “patsies”. That is, they were paid by the government. I don’t believe that they themselves flew the planes into, as I said previously, allegations are that the government has this device that we codename Cyclops that allows, from an airbase nearby, to disable the pilot’s control of an airliners and to fly them by remote control.

AJ: That’s admitted. It’s decades old. It’s called Global Hawk.

SH: Yeah, Global Hawk, right. Of course, the government denied that it’s “deployed”. They say they’ve got the technology but they haven’t deployed it.

AJ: Let me stop you. Let me stop you. This is really key, Sir. We are so honored to have you. I’ve really studied this and I want to give you.. You probably already have and I want to reiterate it for the listeners. Bush, two days after the attack at a speech in New York said that in the future we can remote control these planes and land them so this doesn’t happen. And someone reached up and physically grabbed him by the arm and made him shut-up. And, if you’ve seen “The Masters of Terror,” we have the two Associated Press articles, after you were on our show and brought this up that you have this from inside military officers.....

SH: Yes.

AJ: Suddenly, they had a cover story and two AP articles in the New York Daily News, all in the film, where they said, “Lo and behold, 8:30 in the morning, the CIA was running a drill of flying jetliners into buildings in New York and D.C.” It just so happened at that very minute they were running this and it just so happened that NORAD stood down for an hour and half, the 58 minutes in different cases. I mean it’s incredible when you add all this together. Go ahead.

SH: Yeah, that’s right. The official government party line is, the first line of defense is the cause and effect of science fiction doesn’t exist. But that’s a total lie. Anybody that works – and I’ve spoken to hundreds of mechanics and maintenance managers at United Airlines and American Airlines and several others and they all confirm that technology exists.

AJ: Well, how do drones operate? The company is in Fort Worth.

SH: Sure, sure, the question is has it been deployed. The answer is: yes, it has. I have one witness who was on the very same United aircraft from Newark, New Jersey to San Francisco, four days before September 11th, and observed certain individuals on that plane who were then later claimed to be the hijackers. He observed them speaking with the government agents.

AJ: Is that Mr. Woods?

SH: I can’t disclose names on that right now.

AJ: And then, he was threatened. I don’t know if it is Woods but Woods said, he....

SH: No, it’s not Woods. It’s someone else. It’s someone else. This is a civilian.

AJ: But with Woods, the famous actor, (garbled) and this is a problem, the FBI came and said you tell anybody about this and you are going to jail.

SH: Well yes, that’s right. The anti-Patriot Act I and II, as I call them, are the tools which are very similar to what happened in Nazi Germany, Hitler’s enabling act after the Reichstag fire. It gave him dictatorial power. That’s the goal here. That’s the end run. This is what we have to look at here – what their purpose ultimately is. I mean this attempt to invade Iraq now, for no purpose, is coming I guess next week or the week after, is just starting. This was planned long before 9/11. These people around Wolfowitz and so forth. I mean I went to school with Wolfowitz. I was at the same university in the late ‘60s when he was very active with the Israelis over there at the University of Chicago. He was pursuing a PhD and these people have an agenda. It’s not an agenda that helps the America people; it’s an attempt to use this country and its power, to wreck this country, in the service of another nefarious and ulterior goal.

AJ: Now, Mr. Hilton, there is a lot to cover. Can we just go through your depositions and this is incredibly dangerous. You have incredible, amazing honor and will, and I mean this Sir. God bless you. People like you are going to save this country. Your witnesses do...You know what you are doing is very, very dangerous. I’m going to be honest with you, I hope you have large life insurance policies.

SH: (Laughs)

AJ: I need them too, but no, what you are really doing pierces the veil and you are on target. But there is so many of us now, it’s why they are on the run and we are on the march. Go down some of the key stuff you’ve got in depositions. I don’t want to give your whole case away..

SH: Well, as I mentioned, the individual on the aircraft that was later hijacked, four days later – same flight, same destination – Newark to San Francisco – what he observed, what others on that plane, including United flight attendants observed, were these individuals who four days later were said to be on the plane that crashed it. And they’re government controlled – and there is this term “trade craft,” meaning basically spying, counter spying. And one of the terms in trade craft is control. These Arabs that were alleged to have done it had controls and some of our discovery has identified some of these people. They are FBI and CIA agents who...

AJ: So they had control – actual agents or case officers and they had their little minion drones with them.

SH: Yeah, these people operated in cells. The cells are from six to twelve individuals. And the cells move around, for instance, from Portland, Oregon to San Diego. It’s just one example. But they didn’t move all six to twelve of them by chance. They were instructed to do it. They were at locations or schools or apartments, etc., that were bought here. Again, this is from a direct eyewitness. This has been verified with marriage certificates, documents, photographs – photographs with bin Laden and his brothers.

AJ: Paid for by the U.S. Government. That’s official.

SH: Yeah.

AJ: Associated Press, Washington Post and they just kind of brush that over.

SH: See the thing is that you look back in ’93 and ’95, Oklahoma City, World Trade Center, and you say well Clinton was in power; whereas now it’s Bush. So you say well how could it be the same players here? The answer is that the shadow government transcends individual political puppets that occupy 1600 Pennsylvania. I mean it doesn’t really make much difference whether it’s Clinton or Bush. The shadow government, as I call it, essentially is continuous. These bureaucrats that you’ve got there at the Pentagon, State Dept., White House, etc., they stay on. They stay on from administration to administration pursuing a certain agenda. And I think this is all part of a pattern. And the latest example, manifestation was 9/11. You’ve got that and the anthrax attack which happened immediately right after 9/11.

AJ: Well that turns out – the most weaponized form of anthrax ever seen, U.S. Government patented design. It is incredibly small microns, levels, coated in bentonite, sent and then Bush is on Cipro, the anthrax antibiotic on September 10th, with his cabinet. Judicial Watch tries to serve a summons to depose the press secretary who admitted this and they tell them at the front gate, you’ll be arrested if you depose us. Did you hear about that?

SH: Yes, I did.

AJ: Stay there. I mean Clinton didn’t even do that. Stanley Hilton, an amazing man, we'll be right back.

<Continues......>



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (735)6/7/2003 1:12:48 AM
From: JBTFD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20039
 
That was an interesting report. I just lost some respect for Alex Jones, though, after listening to his "debate" with Noam Chomsky via mp3. It is fine until the third file, where he needs to pick a fight. He brings up gun violence, and tries to argue that gun deaths are higher in England than in the US. Now if someone can show me some proof of that I would be interested. After Chomsky leaves the show he has a major "prick attack" calling him a "one world government shill" and calling him derogatory names for the next 10 minutes. What a chump. In his calling Chomsky a "one world Government shill" I think maybe he doth protest too much. I guess he doesn't want information to interfere with his party spirit.

The funny thing is on the gun issue I am probably right of center.