Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (99710)	5/31/2003 11:13:23 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Oh, he can say it but only the naive will believe it. You wouldn't believe Sharon if he was swearing on the Torah, John. And your putdown of perfectly valid numbers lately has really got out of control. Now you are to the point on Wolfowitz that you are saying, "Who are you going to believe, Vanity Fair or the tape?" Vanity Fair twisted Wolfies' statement to make their point. Here is the CNN article on it. Not that it will make any difference to you. WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A Vanity Fair article "misrepresents" statements made by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz about U.S. justification for the invasion of Iraq, Pentagon officials said. The quotes in the article were shortened and thus out of context, one said. The article by Sam Tanenhaus quoted Wolfowitz as saying, "For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on." The Pentagon says a full reading of the transcript of the telephone interview Wolfowitz gave the reporter May 9 does not support that interpretation of the deputy secretary's comments. "Vanity Fair only used a portion of the deputy secretary's quote," the source said. "Their omission completely misrepresents what he was saying. The complete quote makes clear that there were multiple reasons for the use of military forces against Iraq." According to a tape recording made by the Pentagon, the actual quote is, "The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction, as the core reason." After a brief pause to take another phone call, Wolfowitz continues, "There have always been three fundamental concerns. One is weapons of mass destruction, the second is support for terrorism, the third is the criminal treatment of the Iraqi people. Actually, I guess you could say there's a fourth overriding one, which is the connection between the first two." A news release promoting the Vanity Fair article said Wolfowitz was contradicting the Bush administration by saying that weapons of mass destruction had never been the most compelling justification for invading Iraq. The distinction between the two versions is important because one of the main premises in the debate for the invasion of Iraq was a need to rid Saddam Hussein's regime of weapons of mass destruction. So far, U.S. forces have found no such weapons. The Pentagon's transcript of the interview is posted on its Web site, www.defenselink.mil. hipakistan.com