Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (410790)	6/1/2003 12:11:46 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 769667

BUSH LIES: The Searchable Database lunaville.com Based on billmon.org.v.sabren.com

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (410790)	6/1/2003 12:29:43 AM
From: Nicholas Thompson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

GB's and his family's links to the Bin laden family are or were widespread . Not to say he was personally involved, certainly not, but the USG moved too quickly to get the bin laden's out of the USA after 9/11 and has since worked to bury evidence of bin l's indirect financing links to charities evidently involved with terrorism. This seems to have been done in large part to protect the GB family from embarrassment. Most , but not all the BL's were fully opposed to Osama's goals, but again not all of them were , according to what i can find out. Of course one can also look at Clinton's poor record at tracking down Osama and blame him for allowing the climate that fostered Osama's daring. one can also look far back and note that Ronnald R. pulled the USA out of Beirut after the barracks and embassy bombings there. GB senior failed to take out Saddam and both RR and GB senior armed Iraq and Osama in the 1980's and early 90's. I just wish we had someone in the White House strong and yet still respected by the majority of the people in most countries. When did that last happen; Kennedy? Roosevelt? Ike?. PS Why did the White House wait over 20 minutes to alert the President to the attacks on the WTC?? What is the answer to that one; did they feel they needed more info?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (410790)	6/1/2003 12:09:40 PM
From: broadstbull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Sid, you posted this... <<< The problem is people don't have a clue as to just how radically Bush has changed our country. Bush is a radical, not a conservative, but he's a radical fascist.>>> C'mon, have you read anything about the changes this country went though during WW2? It is the natural progression of a country to pull back and tighten security after getting kicked in the nutz. As for complaints about treatment of Muslims. We have mosques here in NJ that have been preaching pro Al Queda crap since the 80s. The first WTC bombing was planned in a Jersey City mosque. On 9/11, crowds of Muslims were cheering in the streets of Patterson NJ and in Brooklyn NY, until they realized the impact this would have nation wide, then they shut the F* up. Is it wrong for a govt, hit twice on its own soil to get fed up and try rooting out its enemies? I don't think you realize how brazen some anti American muslims were, right here in this country. How about all of the Al Queda funding from within our country that has been rooted out, is this a myth? I'm not saying all muslims are against us, I bought Bagles from an Egyptian guy yesterday morning. He is OK, he runs a business, doesn't spend his time biting about the infadels. The locals here love him. He has bought into our country, very successfully. Bin Laden made a big mistake on 9/11. Until then we never took these enemies serious. I thank God we have a President that is at least willing to put an end to this stuff, before it ends up being something like a nuke in lower Manhattan.