Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (99821)	6/1/2003 9:05:25 PM
From: JohnM	Respond to of 281500

Oh, you keep persisting in getting me wrong just to have a debating point. I don't believe Vanity Fair as against Wolfowitz. I don't see this as some sort of zero sum game. I'm skeptical of Wolfowitz and of DOD and of Vanity Fair. You've decided you know who the good "guys" are here. The big picture here is that the Bush administration is peddling backwards as fast as it can from the story line they offered the world, that the big reason for invading Iraq was the threat of its use of its wmds. The rest were little reasons running around looking for an audience. Now that the big reason is not carrying its weight, they are trying to rewrite the past. Who knows where this story goes down the road. But for the moment, they are not even doing the honorable thing, which is the Blair position, which is to stick with the story line. Not deny it. You want a leader; you got one in Blair. But the Bush folk are just throwing up lots of fog.