Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ian@SI who wrote (9941)	6/1/2003 9:43:17 PM
From: orkrious	Respond to of 95647

A somewhat encouraging article on the chip sector including the following comment. what about that comment is "encouraging?"

To: Ian@SI who wrote (9941)	6/1/2003 9:47:09 PM
From: Gottfried	Respond to of 95647

Ian, thanks for pointing to that story. Of interest to equipment stock investors is another paragraph >Ramberg claims that Intel is starting to look for second sources for every piece of equipment the big chipmaker purchases -- further evidence, to Ramberg, of pricing pressure on makers of chip fabrication equipment. Intel, says Ramberg, "wouldn't look for this kind of pricing (alternatives) if they thought they could hang on to volume and pricing" for the second quarter. Intel spokesman Robert Manetta says only that the company has "multiple vendors, so we don't have a single point of failure in our fabs." (For more on Intel, see "Oh, Mother!")< Anyone who needs the whole story, pm me. Gottfried

To: Ian@SI who wrote (9941)	6/1/2003 9:56:08 PM
From: Ian@SI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95647

online.wsj.com And an insightful interview with Marty Barnes of BCA including this exchange... Q: What do you point to when you say that? A: There are a lot of things and data you can point to. Mainly, if you look at the data on the capital stock, which the Federal Reserve publishes in its flow-of-funds report, the growth in the capital stock is the lowest it has been in the postwar period. The capital stock is the stock of equipment and software in the corporate sector. All the investment that is made over the years adds up to how much capital you have and whether it is machines or computers or whatever. Relative to gross domestic product, the capital stock is not particularly high by historical standards. The rate of return on capital has been rising recently and is still reasonably high by historical standards. The capacity-utilization rate is low, but that is just a measure of manufacturing and it is driven by the business cycle. It is a short-term problem, and there is no evidence it is a structural problem. The Fed has put a lot of resources into looking at this issue, too, and it couldn't come up with any clear evidence there was a big overhang of excess capital. Companies bought a lot of computers and information-technology equipment in the run-up to Y2K, but a lot of that stuff is obsolete now. It has depreciated. It needs to be replaced. The capital stock now turns over so fast that you have to keep investing just to keep in place. But, in fact, net investment as a percentage of gross domestic product -- investment minus depreciation -- is as low as it ever gets. So there has been a dramatic cutback in corporate capital spending, and that matters, that has an impact.