Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The truth about SI and IHUB -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peter michaelson who wrote (34)	6/2/2003 11:45:55 AM
From: Dale Baker	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 124

In other words, you are all in favor of energetic liars who defend criminals and slander those who haven't been charged with anything? That's different.....

To: peter michaelson who wrote (34)	6/2/2003 11:51:20 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 124

a whistle blower who is indiscriminate in the whistle blowing and who lacks the ability to keep "truth" in the sights, is as bad as the people who she claims to be blowing the whistle on. She is useless in this role because she has destroyed her credibility. I have taken the role of scam buster many times, but I made damn sure that I knew what I was talking about before I did. If she wants to spout off about ihub and SI at yahoo or RB, more power to her, but she is attempting to destroy a site of which I find some value. Because she happened to be on the same side of some issues in the past, doesn't mean that she deserves support for this bullshit. I was over on ihub working the SEVU thread too. I was critical of Matt's policies then, but to state as a fact that he has committed securities fraud is flat out wrong.