SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (170363)6/2/2003 6:48:03 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1588208
 
Al, 9/11 is important because GW and his goons would not have been able to get away with Iraq and their militant approach to world matters if it weren't for 9/11.

Oh...I am not sure. They would have cooked up another reason.


So you're saying that when Bush campaigned on a non imperial US, he was just playing with us and he had every intention of pushing our muscle around in the world?

The fact that they urged Clinton to do it proves today that that they are nothing but premeditated gangsters.

Certainly, the guys behind Bush are out to change the layout of the world.

And I don't think liberals have become pseudo hawks...I think they have been made fearful by well orchestrated propaganda.

That's why I call them psuedo hawks.

Plus the country suffers this post Vietnam extreme guilt syndrome, which all but guarantees the fact that an administration engaging troops in a war, regardless of the ethics of that war, will have the general population frenzied in support of flag and military. It has become a very dangerous problem.

I still think Americans bought into it because of 9/11. I think the days of Vietnam are long gone. If we hadn't been attacked, I don't believe that Bush would have had as easy a time of it going to war. Then again, I live in a fairly liberal area but maybe in TX, they're ready to go to war at the drop of a hat.

ted