SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IBM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (7916)6/3/2003 12:39:54 AM
From: Arrow Hd.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8220
 
Victor, the Barron's piece was trying to make a bear case. When you are analyzing a company as large and as diversified as IBM You can spin it a lot of different ways.
For instance, for years IBM was taken to task for buying back stock instead of investing for the future or for strategic reasons. So they buy PWC which was a huge coup at the price IBM paid and all of the sudden that doesn't count anymore. Take a break Victor, you're hyper-ventilating.



To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (7916)6/3/2003 8:24:56 AM
From: Jules B. Garfunkel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8220
 
Where was the SEC in year 2000 when I owned over 250 Put contracts, as well as being short IBM stock? I was so sure that the quality of IBM's earnings were poor, and posted my thoughts here many times. The SEC'S tardiness cost me a lot of money. Do I stand a chance of recovering any of my loses?
Jules


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News