SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : 5spl -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (1034)6/3/2003 4:06:11 PM
From: JayPC  Respond to of 2534
 
Of course, I think that insider trading is no crime at all, and if it is one, it's essentially victimless.

How can you say its victimless when Joe Sixpack lost money on his 300 shares of ImClone. How dare Martha not lose just as much money. I demand Equality of Result.

Regards
Jay



To: LPS5 who wrote (1034)6/3/2003 6:09:28 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2534
 
A new legal doctrine - Stewart deserves criminal prosecution for being incredibly stupid. She devotes her life to a loony perfectionist crusade to be Miss Perfect and makes hundreds of millions or more. Well done, hard work is rewarded in a fair world.

Then she plays insider games with a pocket change amount of stock so she won't "lose money"?

She is clearly too dumb to have so much cash on hand and an unsullied reputation.

And so it goes.....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News