Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Horgad who wrote (243783)	6/3/2003 4:18:25 PM
From: Horgad	Respond to of 436258

Greenspan Raises Issue of Rate Cut 50 minutes ago Add Business - Reuters to My Yahoo! By Tim Ahmann and Stella Dawson WASHINGTON/BERLIN (Reuters) - Federal Reserve (news - web sites) Chairman Alan Greenspan (news - web sites) said on Tuesday it may be necessary to lower interest rates as "insurance" against deflation even though the U.S. economy appeared set to pick up. His comments three weeks ahead of the Fed's next policy gathering fueled a rally in the U.S. Treasury markets as investors saw the comments as raising the odds the Fed would cut rates to ward off the risk of a widespread drop in consumer prices. "It is too early to get any real fix on the American economy in the period ahead," Greenspan told a conference on monetary policy in Berlin. "There are indications that we are stabilizing, and there is some indication of a return but it is at this stage not by any means clear." Greenspan, who has argued that much of the economy's weakness in recent months was because businesses hunkered down as a U.S.-led war in Iraq (news - web sites) approached, said signs of a pick up were limited but gains in financial markets augured well. "The best that we can judge is that the acceleration has not yet begun even though obviously the marked moves of the stock market in recent weeks, and especially in the credit markets, are suggesting a fairly marked turnaround," he said. While Greenspan expressed confidence the U.S. economy can deliver a modest rebound, he nevertheless held the door open to lower borrowing costs, stressing the economic toll deflation could exact and the low probability inflation would ignite. "We have concluded ... inflation was not something of significance for the Federal Reserve to be concerned about, which means that we would be far more inclined -- as we have had over the last several years -- to be taking out insurance against economic weakness," he said. "The reason why you are hearing a good deal about the deflation issue is that we perceive that as a low probability ... but the cost of addressing it is very small indeed," the Fed chief said. Anthony Karydakis, an economist with Banc One Capital Markets in Chicago, called Greenspan's remarks "cautiously upbeat," but said they kept alive the possibility the Fed could add to the string of 12 rate cuts since early 2001 that has brought borrowing costs to a 1961 low of 1.25 percent. "He's keeping his options open," Karydakis said. "He clearly doesn't believe the case has been made for another ease yet." REASONS FOR HOPE Greenspan said the $350 billion tax-cut package President Bush (news - web sites) signed into law last week would offer a sizable boost to consumers' after-tax income in the third quarter. "Even though I argued that I don't like fiscal policy for short-term stimulus ... I have to admit that fortuitously this particular cut in taxes is happening at the right time," he said. He also said gains in productivity -- worker output per hour -- are continuing. While those gains have helped businesses shore up profits, they have restrained jobs growth. But Greenspan noted forecasters were looking for employment to begin rising modestly soon. "I do expect growth to quicken (news - web sites), maybe not as much as some expect, but everything seems to be in place," he said. While Greenspan showed no sign his faith that the economy would accelerate when the cloud of war dispersed had been shaken, he said it was important for policymakers to consider what the costs might be if their forecasts were wrong. "The more important question that is involved here is not whether you are worrying about something but how you appraise various sets of probabilities and more specifically how you adjust policy," he said. Greenspan said the question for policymakers was: "What are the consequences if you are wrong?"

To: Horgad who wrote (243783)	6/3/2003 4:25:53 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Hograd, Perhaps we could offer some bogus health insurance to poor people that doesn't really cover anything, but that will give them something to show when they walk in the door. It's called BlueCross/Medicare/Medicaid, I see em/it all the time but I also have 70% of my practice that pays nearly 85% of my charges which are below most of the comp...no overhead so I do ok...besides the other docs wont even see these people. and you dont get to see me until your ins checks out or you pay upfront an initial fee which is about 2/3 or a simple visit, keeps people from walking out without paying, country has gone to hell n a handjob...but I try c4t