SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (100231)6/4/2003 4:53:03 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
a little bit of road map progress:

He (Sharon) said he understood the "importance of territorial contiguity in a Palestinian state on the West Bank". Mr Sharon had previously been believed to support a Palestinian state on the West Bank broken up into isolated sectors by Israeli settlements.
But, as he discussed the settlements, he spoke only of "unauthorised outposts" believed to refer to the hill top positions established since the beginning of the intifada.
"In regard to unauthorised outposts, I want to reiterate that Israel is a society governed by the rule of law and that we will dismantle all unauthorised outposts," he said.
guardian.co.uk



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (100231)6/4/2003 4:55:13 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Jacob, do you live in Never-Never land, or Alaska?

Did you actually hear anybody in the Bush administration say that protecting the safety of the oil supply was unimportant? I don't think so.

There's a long, long continuum between "it's all about oil" and "we don't care about oil."



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (100231)6/4/2003 5:45:22 PM
From: NickSE  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Another British Attack on Wolfowitz
littlegreenfootballs.com

The Guardian, not to be outdone by the Independent and Vanity Fair, is the latest anti-American rag to misquote Paul Wolfowitz, with a hideously misleading headline and a quote that’s taken so far out of context that it qualifies as deliberate deception: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil.

Asked why a nuclear power such as North Korea was being treated differently from Iraq, where hardly any weapons of mass destruction had been found, the deputy defence minister said: "Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil."

Here we go again.

The official DoD transcript of Wolfowitz’s remarks: Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz Remarks at the IISS Asian Security Conference. Notice please: no mention of oil (in the Guardian’s context) in the transcript at all.

But here, in Maryland’s SunSpot.net, we find the truth about the comment the Guardian tried to use to smear Wolfowitz and the United States, which apparently happened in a Q&A session, not in the actual speech:

Wolfowitz is on a five-day visit to Asia to coordinate U.S. military strategy with Asian allies, and will travel from Singapore to Seoul, South Korea and Tokyo. He has been calling for a "firm, common, multilateral position" among the United States, South Korea, Japan, China and Russia to put economic pressure on North Korea for a verifiable dismantling of its nuclear weapons programs. Because most aid and trade with North Korea comes from the other nations, the United States cannot go it alone, he said.

The difference between North Korea and Iraq, Wolfowitz said, is that the United States could not use economic pressure to strangle Hussein's regime "because the country floats on a sea of oil." North Korea, by comparison, is near economic collapse, and that offers "a major point of leverage," he said.


Once again, British scum sheets are showing their utter desperation and moral bankruptcy, by lying blatantly about Paul Wolfowitz. Disgraceful.

UPDATE: LGF reader Dave H. points out this DoD transcript of the Q&A session which contains the actual quote from Wolfowitz: Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz Q&A following IISS Asia Security Conference.

Look, the primary difference -- to put it a little too simply -- between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil.