Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter W. Panchyshyn who wrote (5955)	6/5/2003 11:38:34 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

<How much we dont know for certain. > Just like most here... yet you claimed I was "loading up"! Then you call me [and others] a liar about Paramount AND my overall positions in trusts? Look, my response to you was a flabbergasted one that you were actually here 'scanning the board' to see who the losers were and compare them to your list of those "you argue with". Nothing to do with Paramount and total disregard for what any past arguments might have been about... just personal ego building, [we're liars, and you're not] period. Sorry I know you may not want to look at that.... but's it's all it is: <it can be and usually is viewed by many joe averages as a recommendation. > Peter, to be honest, this has always simply been your sad excuse to crusade against anyone you don't like over here... and those who don't like you. Gives you an excuse to assert yourself in inappropriate ways 'in the name of the lurker'. Pretty sick IMO. <And it is the likes of you and others who first started the bashing a long time ago. > Well, at least we know what this is all about. <What exactly does this apples and oranges comparison suppose to tell.> Your quote was an answer to a direct question to you about Paramount and Viking, and shows that at best you had no opinion about either one: Message 18705203 My point stands, simply that you said nothing to save ANYONE from buying Paramount given a direct chance... I said 'not all that helpful'... and that's about correct don't you think? My related comments were NEVER a recommendation, and reserve life actually negative. <You and others are lying about your positions. That you and the others carefully chose not to reveal some real numbers when talking of how much and how much more you were buying says it all quite clearly. Those who wish to believe that can do as they like and they will suffer for it just like they already have ------------- >> I know you keep saying that Peter... "me and others" who np doubt argued with you right? And probably not even about fundamentals or companies, probably personal pissing contetests ritht? And were "so careful" not to reveal our 'size'? ROFLMAO! I know my big argument was about overall reserve life of trusts, their replacement costs vs the trusts pricing, not even about an individual company. Look, anyone who's been around, lurkers or regulars catch the drift now...they don't need our commentary.. stop back next time you can puff your feathers out. DAK