Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (100366)	6/5/2003 12:30:28 PM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 281500

>>I'm very concerned now about this thread but have no ideas as to what should be done. I'm considering changing my own personal policy, however, to simply not replying to personal attacks rather than one reply of like kind and then not replying.<< You could try putting a sock in it whenever you have the urge to insult someone, and truly stay above the fray, instead of insulting people while claiming you stay above the fray. Just a thought.

To: JohnM who wrote (100366)	6/5/2003 2:40:56 PM
From: Murrey Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I've seen your comments only twice... I'm confused. Surely you know how to find more than a couple of posts of mine on this thread. I told you I had made remarks to Win on two different occasions. ...both criticizing posts of mine, each of which was, if you had read them in context, replies to previous attacks. I was only alluding to a practice I think you were guilty of: "The pot calling the kettle black". If you take that as criticism, so be it...if it quacks... You do seem to project complete innocence often, read: "I really don't know what you're talking about - my goodness, I certainly wouldn't do or say anything like that." Your demureness fools some of the people, some of the time, but yes, I guess I am being critical of you in this post. Quack! Quack!

To: JohnM who wrote (100366)	6/5/2003 2:46:53 PM
From: Murrey Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I've seen your comments only twice... I'm confused. Surely you know how to find more than a couple of posts of mine on this thread. I told you I had made remarks to Win on two different occasions. ...both criticizing posts of mine, each of which was, if you had read them in context, replies to previous attacks. I was only alluding to a practice I think you were guilty of: "The pot calling the kettle black". If you take that as criticism, so be it...if it quacks... You do seem to project complete innocence often, read: "I really don't know what you're talking about - my goodness, I certainly wouldn't do or say anything like that." Your demureness fools some of the people, some of the time, but yes, I gues I am being critical of you in this post. Quack! Quack!