Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (5966)	6/5/2003 10:45:49 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

<------- Has a lot to do with PMT. > LOL, yea, none of which you discussed, even given the chance. -----In my last posting Message 19005633 I discussed this in relation to PMT """"" ------- Has a lot to do with PMT. Has to do with doing the proper due diligence. Has to do with not ignoring past evidence past history. Like that previous shutin Paramount experienced. Has to do with glossing over ones own impact from the recent collapse in unit price. Has to do with trying to say that a discussion of RLI on a different trust PGF is somehow the very same as a government shutin of current production. As I said RLI (reserve writedown) may or may not impact distributions several years into the future. If the trust should do nothing about it. Which they obviously dont let happen. This PMT shutin by the government will have a more immediate impact on the nearer term both in terms of unit price and in terms of distributions going forward from NOW ---------------"""""" You completely ignore the points raised above . Refuse to even believe they are there. And have the nerve to say I introduced nothing when given the chance. You havent responded to any of those above for obvious reason you cant counter them with any sort of fact or data. I challenge you to do so. Why are you so afraid. I even made mention of the previous shutin of production to Kastelco in an earlier posting to him. And please show in any of the current news about PMT that there is mention of the (your) main concern of reserves. There isnt any. Its all about the shutin of current production. Reserves had nothing to do with the current happenings period. Yet for some reason you raise a previous discussion of it to defend your position. Just how does it fit into the picture?????? IT DOESNT. -----