Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (100440)	6/5/2003 8:33:51 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Respond to of 281500

<the progress now being made between Israeli and the Palestinians would never have happened if Saddam Hussein was still in power. Just that alone makes the war worthwhile.> Yet another reason for the war. That's, what, reason #37? Or is it #39? I've lost track. Can you post where Mr. O'Reilly, or anyone else, told us about this "reason", before the war? I don't recall anyone, certainly no one in the Administration, saying anything like this, before. In all the many polls before the war, Americans were asked whether they supported going to war for other reasons, but not this one, because nobody had invented this reason, yet. Isn't it a little bizarre, to only come out with the supposed reason for the war, after the war?