Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (170662)	6/6/2003 1:03:12 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583384

Al, do you notice how no one hardly ever responds to a posted article when it doesn't present the president's view, or even worse, when it makes it clear that the behavior of the WH was even slightly questionable? I've responded to your statements on the issue again and again. Trying to respond to every statement you and Al can cut and paste would take too much time. I already spend a lot of time just trying to keep up with responding on SI even if I mostly limit myself to responding to what you and Al type. I was referring to the articles that question the veracity of Bush/Blair's WMD statements before the war, and not my postings. The articles give info that supports the notion that they at least misspoke, if not deceived us, on the issue of WMD. And yet those articles, for all practical purposes, are totally ignored. As for Saddam and nukes, the claim was that he was working on them not that he had them. Yes, they claimed that the tubes Saddam had were for nukes and that he bought uranium to build nukes neither of which were true. In addition, it looks like there may have been some hanky panky re. the paperwork shown for the uranium purchase. Certainly, worst things than Clinton lying about sex, and yet, the silence from the conservative portion on this board is deafening. That was the point that I was trying to make. ted