Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (157740)	6/14/2003 1:59:19 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 164684

90% of what? What statistics are you making up now? is it not a 10 year plan? is not 1 year 10% of of 10 years? the remaining 9 years is 90% right? you discussed 1 year, leaving out 90% of the 10 year tax cut plan. is that simple enough? No, you didn't. i did make up the term, but i wasn't the first. i have to admit to that now that i've done a search on it. even so, where's your argument trickle down is better? where are your stats? or do you want us all to just drink rd kool aid? -lol- give you an opportunity to show you understood what you alledged - that trickle down was better than trickle up in an oversupply condition. you staggered us all with... nothing! -lol- That wasn't what you asked and I never said any such thing. Your games are getting stupid... er... scratch "getting." -lol- trying to change the subject, eh? i asked a simple question and you failed to answer it b/c you obviously can't. instead, you tried to throw the question back at me. you can get all caught in the minutae - for you must to divert attention away from your inability to answer my straight forward question. but the fact you've support your assertion with zippo is still a fact.