Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (5972)	6/6/2003 12:20:38 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

Peter, my point was none of that helped the lurker... ------- If you want to concentrate on one part of one posting then that "may" be true. For or in that instance. But what did help those lurkers who follow all my postings is that I never said I was joining the hype and buying PMT. In fact what I have said many times past is that I dont buy trusts that dont have a past history to them. That one can check on. And that I play the newer ones ONLY through the diversifieds that have been around and have themselves a history to go by. Many have taken that advice to heart. And that helped. ---------- everyone's reading about it NOW. ----- This recent case concerning PMT is not an isolated occurrence. It or more importantly something like it has happened many times in the past to a good number of trusts. And you know what something like it will most surely come up and happen again. Investors will miss something important or not do the proper due diligence and they will get stung again. Reading about this now. They will be prepared. They will know you dont ignore anything. Especially the likes of past history or past trading. You dont look at one side. And probably most important you demand real answers real facts and real data and dont take opinion as fact no matter how good it is presented or how many others follow it. ----- It was in response to your insistance I am somehow responsible for getting lurkers to buy PMT. ----- I'll put this to rest by saying that I will leave it up to the lurkers to decide if those who openly partake in or drove the hype are responsible or not for the results / fallout. Or if those who never partook are innocent or not -----