Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (412253)	6/6/2003 4:12:29 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

The Bush objective-stated repeatedly, but denied by you anti-American slimes-was regime change. We got it. We won't give it back, and you domestic enemies will just have to LIVE with it, because Bush will get 60+% of the vote in 2004, with LONG coattails. And you did it to YOURSELVES...

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (412253)	6/6/2003 4:16:26 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Most Americans are happy with our new colony. Hope I can heat my house for pennies next winter.

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (412253)	6/6/2003 4:39:21 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You have no proof of that whatsoever. CIA director Tenet stands behind the intelligence estimates, and the DIA report that caused such a furor merely says that they have a strong presumptive case, but cannot claim certainty about all their assertions. In the UK, their intelligence office stands behind the substance of their reports, but notes that some of the items were based on single sources, instead of being corroborated. Part of the controversy is how those single source assertions got to be there. In any case, once the Iraqis knew we had solid intelligence, after the Powell presentation, they had plenty of time to get rid of, by several methods, including merely moving things, a lot of the evidence. In a case like that, it is much to soon to tell what is going on......

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (412253)	6/6/2003 8:25:46 PM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

My long time friend, Neo said it much more eloquently than I ever could... To:gerard mangiardi who wrote (412253) From: Neocon Friday, Jun 6, 2003 4:39 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 412349 You have no proof of that whatsoever. CIA director Tenet stands behind the intelligence estimates, and the DIA report that caused such a furor merely says that they have a strong presumptive case, but cannot claim certainty about all their assertions. In the UK, their intelligence office stands behind the substance of their reports, but notes that some of the items were based on single sources, instead of being corroborated. Part of the controversy is how those single source assertions got to be there. In any case, once the Iraqis knew we had solid intelligence, after the Powell presentation, they had plenty of time to get rid of, by several methods, including merely moving things, a lot of the evidence. In a case like that, it is much to soon to tell what is going on......