Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (100605)	6/7/2003 3:12:29 PM
From: KonKilo	Respond to of 281500

This is why the concept of an imposed solution has so much merit. I'm surprised it has not been considered seriously. I agree that this is the only half-way viable solution at this point, but how much chance do we have of it actually happening, since it would require us to treat Israel like a rebellious child? I do not foresee any US administration doing that, even though it needs to be done.

To: carranza2 who wrote (100605)	6/7/2003 7:31:30 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

This is why the concept of an imposed solution has so much merit. I'm surprised it has not been considered seriously. I'm not. The Israelis would trust no one to be the peacekeepers of this imposed peace, not even the Americans, unless subject to extreme pressure. All that American peacekeepers would accomplish is taking over the anti-terrorism duties on the West Bank and Gaza. Sounds like fun, yes? The Israeli/Pal conflict will be solved when both sides want it solved, and everybody else butts out. For now, the chief problem is that only one side wants it solved. The other side is willing to spend the next hundred years or so chucking out "the new Crusaders". You have to understand the timescale Hamas and Fatah work on to make any sense out of their actions.